Literature DB >> 7479944

Restriction-modification systems as genomic parasites in competition for specific sequences.

K Kusano1, T Naito, N Handa, I Kobayashi.   

Abstract

Restriction-modification (RM) systems are believed to have evolved to protect cells from foreign DNA. However, this hypothesis may not be sufficient to explain the diversity and specificity in sequence recognition, as well as other properties, of these systems. We report that the EcoRI restriction endonuclease-modification methylase (rm) gene pair stabilizes plasmids that carry it and that this stabilization is blocked by an RM of the same sequence specificity (EcoRI or its isoschizomer, Rsr I) but not by an RM of a different specificity (PaeR7I) on another plasmid. The PaeR7I rm likewise stabilizes plasmids, unless an rm gene pair with identical sequence specificity is present. Our analysis supports the following model for stabilization and incompatibility: the descendants of cells that have lost an rm gene pair expose the recognition sites in their chromosomes to lethal attack by any remaining restriction enzymes unless modification by another RM system of the same specificity protects these sites. Competition for specific sequences among these selfish genes may have generated the great diversity and specificity in sequence recognition among RM systems. Such altruistic suicide strategies, similar to those found in virus-infected cells, may have allowed selfish RM systems to spread by effectively competing with other selfish genes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7479944      PMCID: PMC40578          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.11095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  Restriction and modification determined by a Pseudomonas R plasmid.

Authors:  G A Jacoby; L Sutton
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Nucleotide sequence of the BsuRI restriction-modification system.

Authors:  A Kiss; G Posfai; C C Keller; P Venetianer; R J Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The population dynamics of maternal-effect selfish genes.

Authors:  M J Wade; R W Beeman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  DNA adenine methylation of GATC sequences appeared recently in the Escherichia coli lineage.

Authors:  T Barbeyron; K Kean; P Forterre
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Multimerization of high copy number plasmids causes instability: CoIE1 encodes a determinant essential for plasmid monomerization and stability.

Authors:  D K Summers; D J Sherratt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Cloning vectors that yield high levels of single-stranded DNA for rapid DNA sequencing.

Authors:  R J Zagursky; M L Berman
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Mini-F plasmid genes that couple host cell division to plasmid proliferation.

Authors:  T Ogura; S Hiraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cloned restriction/modification system from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  T R Gingeras; J E Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Specific-purpose plasmid cloning vectors. I. Low copy number, temperature-sensitive, mobilization-defective pSC101-derived containment vectors.

Authors:  T Hashimoto-Gotoh; F C Franklin; A Nordheim; K N Timmis
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  47 in total

1.  Cellular responses to postsegregational killing by restriction-modification genes.

Authors:  N Handa; A Ichige; K Kusano; I Kobayashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle).

Authors:  N E Murray
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Postsegregational killing does not increase plasmid stability but acts to mediate the exclusion of competing plasmids.

Authors:  T F Cooper; J A Heinemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution.

Authors:  I Kobayashi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Unusual evolutionary history of the tRNA splicing endonuclease EndA: relationship to the LAGLIDADG and PD-(D/E)XK deoxyribonucleases.

Authors:  J M Bujnicki; L Rychlewski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A DNA methyltransferase can protect the genome from postdisturbance attack by a restriction-modification gene complex.

Authors:  Noriko Takahashi; Yasuhiro Naito; Naofumi Handa; Ichizo Kobayashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Within-host competition selects for plasmid-encoded toxin-antitoxin systems.

Authors:  Tim F Cooper; Tiago Paixão; Jack A Heinemann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Characterization of the Phd repressor-antitoxin boundary.

Authors:  James Estle McKinley; Roy David Magnuson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Selection for plasmid post-segregational killing depends on multiple infection: evidence for the selection of more virulent parasites through parasite-level competition.

Authors:  T F Cooper; J A Heinemann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Stability of EcoRI restriction-modification enzymes in vivo differentiates the EcoRI restriction-modification system from other postsegregational cell killing systems.

Authors:  Asao Ichige; Ichizo Kobayashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.