Literature DB >> 7479700

Size-independent comparison of protein three-dimensional structures.

V N Maiorov1, G M Crippen.   

Abstract

Protein structures are routinely compared by their root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) in atomic coordinates after optimal rigid body superposition. What is not so clear is the significance of different RMSD values, particularly above the customary arbitrary cutoff for obvious similarity of 2-3 A. Our earlier work argued for an intrinsic cutoff for protein similarity that varied with the number of residues in the polypeptide chains being compared. Here we introduce a new measure, rho, of structural similarity based on RMSD that is independent of the sizes of the molecules involved, or of any other special properties of molecules. When rho is less than 0.4-0.5, protein structures are visually recognized to be obviously similar, but the mathematically pleasing intrinsic cutoff of rho < 1.0 corresponds to overall similarity in folding motif at a level not usually recognized until smoothing of the polypeptide chain path makes it striking. When the structures are scaled to unit radius of gyration and equal principle moments of inertia, the comparisons are even more universal, since they are no longer obscured by differences in overall size and ellipticity. With increasing chain length, the distribution of rho for pairs of random structures is skewed to higher values, but the value for the best 1% of the comparisons rises only slowly with the number of residues. This level is close to an intrinsic cutoff between similar and dissimilar comparisons, namely the maximal scaled rho possible for the two structures to be more similar to each other than one is to the other's mirror image. The intrinsic cutoff is independent of the number of residues or points being compared. For proteins having fewer than 100 residues, the 1% rho falls below the intrinsic cutoff, so that for very small proteins, geometrically significant similarity can often occur by chance. We believe these ideas will be helpful in judging success in NMR structure determination and protein folding modeling.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7479700     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340220308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  33 in total

1.  The topomer-sampling model of protein folding.

Authors:  D A Debe; M J Carlson; W A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interplay between hydrophobic cluster and loop propensity in beta-hairpin formation: a mechanistic study.

Authors:  Giorgio Colombo; Giacomo M S De Mori; Danilo Roccatano
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Simulations of the p97 complex suggest novel conformational states of hydrolysis intermediates.

Authors:  Jeff Wereszczynski; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Systematic determination of order parameters for chain dynamics using diffusion maps.

Authors:  Andrew L Ferguson; Athanassios Z Panagiotopoulos; Pablo G Debenedetti; Ioannis G Kevrekidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  An experimental and computational investigation of spontaneous lasso formation in microcin J25.

Authors:  Andrew L Ferguson; Siyan Zhang; Igor Dikiy; Athanassios Z Panagiotopoulos; Pablo G Debenedetti; A James Link
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A novel approach to structural alignment using realistic structural and environmental information.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Gordon M Crippen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Evolutionary conservation of protein backbone flexibility.

Authors:  Sandra Maguid; Sebastián Fernández-Alberti; Gustavo Parisi; Julián Echave
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Conformational analysis of the carboxy-terminal tails of human beta-tubulin isotypes.

Authors:  Tyler Luchko; J Torin Huzil; Maria Stepanova; Jack Tuszynski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Computational and experimental studies on β-sheet breakers targeting Aβ1-40 fibrils.

Authors:  Velia Minicozzi; Roberta Chiaraluce; Valerio Consalvi; Cesare Giordano; Claudia Narcisi; Pasqualina Punzi; Giancarlo C Rossi; Silvia Morante
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  The meaning of alignment: lessons from structural diversity.

Authors:  Walter Pirovano; K Anton Feenstra; Jaap Heringa
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.