Literature DB >> 7479399

Tibial pilon fractures: a comparative clinical study of management techniques and results.

E H Crutchfield1, D Seligson, S L Henry, A Warnholtz.   

Abstract

Thirty-eight consecutive pilon fractures were reviewed retrospectively to compare the radiographic and clinical results with the original injuries based on three different treatment options: external fixation only, external fixation with limited internal fixation, and internal fixation only. Dates of injury were from February 1985 to February 1989. Treatment method was the surgeon's preference. The mean follow-up time was 28 months. Results were tabulated by clinical and radiographic scores. In general, simple fracture types had good results; complex ones did less well. In this study, fracture severity appeared to be the key variable in outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7479399     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19950701-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  3 in total

1.  Ilizarov treatment of complex tibial pilon fractures.

Authors:  S Vidyadhara; Sharath K Rao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Quantifying tibial plafond fracture severity: absorbed energy and fragment displacement agree with clinical rank ordering.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Teresa Mosqueda; Thaddeus Thomas; Evan L Hermanson; Thomas D Brown; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  External fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for tibial pilon fractures: A meta-analysis based on observational studies.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Meng; Xu-Hui Zhou
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2016-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.