| Literature DB >> 7478453 |
P Montandon1, M Benchaou, J P Guyot.
Abstract
Mastoid tympanoplasty with a canal wall-up technique provides better conditions for a healthy skin lining than canal wall-down techniques. The formation of retraction pockets in residual pneumatized cavities is however a major cause of cholesteatoma recurrence with canal wall-up techniques. We have therefore attempted to combine the advantages of both canal wall-down and canal wall-up techniques. The posterior wall is kept up, the mastoid is obliterated with adipose tissue, the attic is exteriorized in the ear canal and hearing is restored with a minimal-size hypotympanic cavity only. Preliminary results from 41 cases with a follow-up of 6 months to 6 years suggest that skin conditions in the enlarged ear canal are adequate and that cholesteatoma do not recur.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1995 PMID: 7478453 DOI: 10.1159/000276739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec ISSN: 0301-1569 Impact factor: 1.538