Literature DB >> 7475964

Receptor reserve and affinity of mu opioid agonists in mouse antinociception: correlation with receptor binding.

G Zernig1, T Issaevitch, J H Broadbear, T F Burke, J W Lewis, G A Brine, J H Woods.   

Abstract

In order to quantitate the extent to which opioid agonist potencies obtained in behavioral assays are determined by the apparent in vivo affinity and efficacy of the agonist, the antinociceptive effects of the mu opioid agonists morphine, fentanyl, etonitazene, and NIH 10741 were assessed before and after administration of the insurmountable mu opioid antagonist clocinnamox (CCAM) in a 55 degrees C warm-water tail withdrawal test in Swiss albino mice. Under control conditions, all four mu opioid agonists produced a full antinociceptive response with the following ED50 values (in mg/kg): morphine, 12; fentanyl, 0.47; etonitazene, 0.039; NIH 10741, 0.0051. Analysis of CCAM's effects according to Black and Leff gave the following agonist efficacy or tau values: Morphine, 4; fentanyl 15, etonitazene, 7; and NIH 10741, 59. The respective KA values were (in mg/kg): morphine, 29; fentanyl, 7.3; etonitazene, 0.22; and NIH 10741, 0.30. The major determinant of the experimentally observed ED50 values seemed to be the apparent in vivo affinity of the respective agonist and not its efficacy. KA values (expressed as mol/kg) correlated with the Ki values (in mol/l) obtained with [3H]DAMGO radioligand binding (r = 0.96 for pKA vs. pKi), although being on average 11,000-fold higher. Values for q, the available receptor fraction as determined in the behavioral experiments, correlated strongly (r = 0.96) with the q values determined by ex vivo [3H]DAMGO- and [3H]naltrexone equilibrium binding (i.e., Bmax,clocinnamox/Bmax,control), the relationship approaching unity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7475964     DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(95)02204-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  10 in total

1.  In vivo apparent pA2 analysis in rats treated with either clocinnamox or morphine.

Authors:  E A Walker; T M Richardson; A M Young
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Monoclonal Antibodies for Combating Synthetic Opioid Intoxication.

Authors:  Lauren C Smith; Paul T Bremer; Candy S Hwang; Bin Zhou; Beverly Ellis; Mark S Hixon; Kim D Janda
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  G protein-coupled receptor heteromerization: a role in allosteric modulation of ligand binding.

Authors:  Ivone Gomes; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Kai Ye; Emeline L Maillet; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 4.  Opioid system and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Zhiyou Cai; Anna Ratka
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Clocinnamox inhibits the intravenous self-administration of opioid agonists in rhesus monkeys: comparison with effects on opioid agonist-mediated antinociception.

Authors:  G Zernig; J W Lewis; J H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Hydromorphone efficacy and treatment protocol impact on tolerance and mu-opioid receptor regulation.

Authors:  Priyank Kumar; Soujanya Sunkaraneni; Sunil Sirohi; Shveta V Dighe; Ellen A Walker; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Effects of μ-opioid receptor modulation on the hippocampal network activity of sharp wave and ripples.

Authors:  Panagiotis Giannopoulos; Costas Papatheodoropoulos
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Dosing protocol and analgesic efficacy determine opioid tolerance in the mouse.

Authors:  Priyanka A Madia; Shveta V Dighe; Sunil Sirohi; Ellen A Walker; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The analgesic efficacy of fentanyl: relationship to tolerance and mu-opioid receptor regulation.

Authors:  Sunil Sirohi; Shveta V Dighe; Ellen A Walker; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Opioid agonist efficacy predicts the magnitude of tolerance and the regulation of mu-opioid receptors and dynamin-2.

Authors:  Mohit Pawar; Priyank Kumar; Soujanya Sunkaraneni; Sunil Sirohi; Ellen A Walker; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.432

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.