Literature DB >> 7475656

First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). CABRI Trial Participants.

.   

Abstract

The Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation (CABRI) is a multinational, multicentre randomised trial comparing the strategies of revascularisation by CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) and PTCA (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. 1054 patients (820 men and 234 women) were recruited from 26 European cardiac centres. The average age was 60 years and 62% presented with angina of class 3 or greater. 513 patients were randomised to CABG and 541 to PTCA, and 93% and 96%, respectively, of those randomised underwent the allocated procedure. This first report presents data analysed by intention to treat and documents all deaths, major cardiac events, and the symptom status of the patients 1 year after randomisation. After 1 year of follow-up, 14 (2.7%) of those randomised to CABG and 21 (3.9%) of those randomised to PTCA had died. The PTCA group's relative risk (RR) of death was 1.42 (95% CI 0.73-2.76). Patients randomised to PTCA required significantly more reinterventions; only 66.4% reached 1 year with a single revascularisation procedure compared with 93.5% of patients randomised to CABG (RR = 5.23 [3.90-7.03], p < 0.001). The patients in the PTCA group took significantly more medication at 1 year (RR = 1.30 [1.18-1.43], p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have clinically significant angina (RR = 1.54 [1.09-2.16], p = 0.012); this association was present in both sexes but was significant only in females. CABRI is the largest trial of CABG versus PTCA to be reported so far. Its findings are consistent with previous studies, and add to the weight of information that clinicians need to discuss with patients when options for the management of severe angina are under consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7475656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  46 in total

Review 1.  Differences in outcome between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary bypass grafting.

Authors:  J S Alpert
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes: evolving concepts.

Authors:  J J Brennan; H S Cabin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Drugs used in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: case presentation.

Authors:  S Maxwell; W S Waring
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Is surgery still the preferred option for coronary revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease?

Authors:  A Kapur; I S Malik
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Indications for percutaneous and surgical revascularisation: how far does the evidence base guide us?

Authors:  P M Schofield
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  K J Beatt; K P Morgan; A Kapur
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Mohit Bhandari; Mike Clarke; Victor M Montori; Deborah J Cook; Salim Yusuf; David L Sackett; Claudio S Cinà; S D Walter; Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; Geoffrey R Norman; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-08

Review 9.  Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zaher Fanari; Sandra A Weiss; Wei Zhang; Seema S Sonnad; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2015-01-22

Review 10.  Percutaneous versus surgical interventions for coronary artery disease in those with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ozlem Soran
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.