Literature DB >> 7475382

Transducers for foot pressure measurement: survey of recent developments.

J Cobb1, D J Claremont.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the development of transducers for the measurement of vertical and shear forces acting on the plantar surface of the foot are reviewed. Barefoot and in-shoe discrete and matrix transducers are reviewed in terms of structure, operation, performance and limitations. Examples of capacitive, piezo-electric, optical, conductive and resistive types of transducer are presented. Where available, the current clinical status is specified.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7475382     DOI: 10.1007/bf02522509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  27 in total

1.  The development of the low profile Liverpool shear transducer.

Authors:  P Laing; H Deogan; D Cogley; S Crerand; P Hammond; L Klenerman
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992-05

Review 2.  The assessment of dynamic foot-to-ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  I J Alexander; E Y Chao; K A Johnson
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1990-12

3.  A method for measuring foot pressures using a high resolution, computerized insole sensor: the effect of heel wedges on plantar pressure distribution and center of force.

Authors:  N E Rose; L A Feiwell; A Cracchiolo
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1992-06

4.  Method for in-shoe shear stress measurement.

Authors:  M Lord; R Hosein; R B Williams
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-05

Review 5.  Foot pressure measurement: a review of clinical findings.

Authors:  M Lord; D P Reynolds; J R Hughes
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1986-10

6.  Pressure distribution beneath the human foot.

Authors:  P J Bennett; L R Duplock
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1993-12

7.  Analysis of the reproducibility and individuality of dynamic pedobarograph images.

Authors:  O E Facey; I D Hannah; D Rosen
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb

8.  Two simple plantar pressure recording devices in clinical use: evaluation using a pedobarograph.

Authors:  R J Minns
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1982-07

9.  Limb length discrepancy. An electrodynographic analysis.

Authors:  J C D'Amico; H D Dinowitz; M Polchaninoff
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1985-12

10.  Critical light reflection at a plastic/glass interface and its application to foot pressure measurements.

Authors:  R P Betts; T Duckworth; I G Austin; S P Crocker; S Moore
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1980-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Carrying Position-Independent Ensemble Machine Learning Step-Counting Algorithm for Smartphones.

Authors:  Zihan Song; Hye-Jin Park; Ngeemasara Thapa; Ja-Gyeong Yang; Kenji Harada; Sangyoon Lee; Hiroyuki Shimada; Hyuntae Park; Byung-Kwon Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  A wireless flexible sensorized insole for gait analysis.

Authors:  Simona Crea; Marco Donati; Stefano Marco Maria De Rossi; Calogero Maria Oddo; Nicola Vitiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  The use of fiber Bragg grating sensors in biomechanics and rehabilitation applications: the state-of-the-art and ongoing research topics.

Authors:  Ebrahim Al-Fakih; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Faisal Rafiq Mahamd Adikan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Comparison of the plantar pressure distributions at different degrees of tilting: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sung-Min Son; Jun-Ho Lee; Yong-Jun Cha
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-03-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.