Literature DB >> 7473439

Alternative prenatal care. Impact of reduced visit frequency, focused visits and continuity of care.

M A Binstock1, G Wolde-Tsadik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of an alternative prenatal care program for low-risk patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Five hundred forty-nine low-risk pregnant women were allocated to the study and control groups. The study group received, on average, eight visits, all of them with one of nine study providers. Each study visit had specific objectives and accompanying targeted patient education handouts. The control group received the usual prenatal care (on average, 13 visits) with different providers, according to the customary schedule.
RESULTS: There were no significant pregnancy outcome differences between the groups. The study vs. control group differed significantly (P < .0001) in patient satisfaction regarding the number of prenatal visits. There was a higher level of satisfaction in the study group concerning continuity of care (P < .0001). The alternative prenatal care program reduced the number of prenatal visits by 27% and was not associated with any change in maternal or perinatal outcomes. Patient satisfaction parameters were either maintained or improved with alternative prenatal care.
CONCLUSION: An alternative prenatal care program for low-risk patients reduced resource utilization without adversely affecting prenatal care process variables, pregnancy outcome or patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7473439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  10 in total

Review 1.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Gp Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Reduced schedule of antenatal visits. Study ignored influence of parity on women's needs.

Authors:  S Vause; M Maresh; K Khaled
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-20

3.  A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: the antenatal care project.

Authors:  J Sikorski; J Wilson; S Clement; S Das; N Smeeton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-02

Review 4.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

5.  Antenatal telephone support intervention with and without uterine artery Doppler screening for low risk nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Vikki J Snaith; Jenny Hewison; Ian N Steen; Stephen C Robson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Determinants of frequency and contents of antenatal care visits in Bangladesh: Assessing the extent of compliance with the WHO recommendations.

Authors:  M Mazharul Islam; Mohammad Shahed Masud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Antenatal care packages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Ndema Abu Habib; João Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Hassan S Baaqeel; Pisake Lumbiganon; Gilda Piaggio; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries.

Authors:  Ana Langer; José Villar; Mariana Romero; Gustavo Nigenda; Gilda Piaggio; Chusri Kuchaisit; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimi; José Miguel Belizán; Ubaldo Farnot; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Guillermo Carroli; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Pisake Lumbiganon; Alain Pinol; Per Bergsjö; Leiv Bakketeig; Jo Garcia; Heinz Berendes
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Implementation of a new prenatal care model to reduce office visits and increase connectivity and continuity of care: protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ridgeway; Annie LeBlanc; Megan Branda; Roger W Harms; Megan A Morris; Kate Nesbitt; Bobbie S Gostout; Lenae M Barkey; Susan M Sobolewski; Ellen Brodrick; Jonathan Inselman; Anne Baron; Angela Sivly; Misty Baker; Dawn Finnie; Rajeev Chaudhry; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Use of wearable sensors for pregnancy health and environmental monitoring: Descriptive findings from the perspective of patients and providers.

Authors:  Jennifer Runkle; Maggie Sugg; Danielle Boase; Shelley L Galvin; Carol C Coulson
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-02-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.