Literature DB >> 7472798

Restructuring the principle of medical futility.

G P Smith1.   

Abstract

This essay surveys the need for a clear and objective definition of medical futility. It is urged that once agreement is obtained for structuring operational guidelines for determining futility, a three-tier decisional structure can be developed for testing whether a given treatment falls within the scope of these guidelines. Under the first tier, the treating physician would be given the primary responsibility for making the determination to withhold treatment on the grounds of futility. While the physician would be under a duty not to prescribe treatment deemed futile, he would be obliged to inform the patient and his family of this decision, including the reasons for it, in order to allow, under the second tier, for an appeal to be taken by the patient or family to the hospital ethics committee. The third tier recognizes a right of limited appeal to the courts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7472798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Care        ISSN: 0825-8597            Impact factor:   2.250


  3 in total

1.  Nonbeneficial or futile medical treatment: conflict resolution guidelines for the San Francisco Bay area. Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees (BANEC) Nonbeneficial Treatment Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  Conditions and consequences of medical futility--from a literature review to a clinical model.

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Medical futility in the post-modern context.

Authors:  John Paul Slosar
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.