Literature DB >> 7472343

Vertical vestibular input to and projections from the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei of the decerebrate cat.

K Endo1, D B Thomson, V J Wilson, T Yamaguchi, B J Yates.   

Abstract

1. To investigate the type of vestibular signals that neurons in the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei transmit to the cerebellum and spinal cord, we studied their responses to natural vestibular stimulation in vertical planes in decerebrate cats with the caudal cerebellum removed. Most neurons were in the caudal half of the descending vestibular nucleus, the remainder at corresponding levels of the medial nucleus or the medial-descending border. 2. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with sinusoidal tilts delivered at 0.05-1 Hz near the plane of body rotation that produced maximal modulation of the neuron's activity (response vector orientation). For most neurons the predominant vestibular input could be identified as coming from otolith organs (46%) or vertical semicircular canals (37%). Some neurons had otolith+canal convergence (9%) and others either had such converging input or some other form of central processing (8%). 3. Gain and phase of the responses of otolith neurons were comparable with values obtained in earlier studies on Deiters' nucleus and the rostral descending nucleus. Many canal neurons had a steeper gain slope and more advanced phase than observed previously for more rostral neurons. This may be due to more irregular afferent input to many neurons or to the absence of the vestibulocerebellum. 4. Response vector orientations of canal neurons were closely bunched near the planes of the ipsilateral vertical canals. The small number of contralaterally projecting vectors showed evidence of convergence between the two contralateral vertical canals. As is the case elsewhere in the vestibular nuclei, there was no evidence of convergence from bilateral vertical canals. Response vector orientations of otolith neurons were restricted to the roll quadrants; the majority pointed ipsilaterally. 5. Antidromic stimulation with an electrode in the restiform body or with several electrodes in the dorsal half of the white matter of the upper cervical cord was used to identify neurons projecting to the cerebellum and spinal cord, respectively. A substantial number of spontaneously firing neurons projected to the cerebellum, but there were few spontaneously active vestibulospinal neurons. The properties of the vestibular input to cerebellar-projecting neurons were the same as those of the population as a whole, but the effect of tilt on vestibulospinal neurons appeared weak or absent. 6. Many neurons were inhibited by stimulation of the restiform body. We suggest that this is mainly due to stimulation of the axons of vestibulocerebellar Purkinje cells. 7. Our results demonstrate a robust vertical vestibular input to the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7472343     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.1.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  Intrinsic firing dynamics of vestibular nucleus neurons.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Sascha du Lac
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Responses of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla to whole body rotations: comparisons in decerebrate and conscious cats.

Authors:  V J Destefino; D A Reighard; Y Sugiyama; T Suzuki; L A Cotter; M G Larson; N J Gandhi; S M Barman; B J Yates
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-04-14

3.  Responses of neurons in the caudal medullary lateral tegmental field to visceral inputs and vestibular stimulation in vertical planes.

Authors:  Jennifer D Moy; Daniel J Miller; Michael F Catanzaro; Bret M Boyle; Sarah W Ogburn; Lucy A Cotter; Bill J Yates; Andrew A McCall
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 4.  Otolith and canal integration on single vestibular neurons in cats.

Authors:  Y Uchino; M Sasaki; H Sato; R Bai; E Kawamoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vestibular nucleus neurons respond to hindlimb movement in the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  Milad S Arshian; Candace E Hobson; Michael F Catanzaro; Daniel J Miller; Sonya R Puterbaugh; Lucy A Cotter; Bill J Yates; Andrew A McCall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Integration of vestibular and gastrointestinal inputs by cerebellar fastigial nucleus neurons: multisensory influences on motion sickness.

Authors:  Michael F Catanzaro; Daniel J Miller; Lucy A Cotter; Andrew A McCall; Bill J Yates
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Vestibulo-sympathetic responses.

Authors:  Bill J Yates; Philip S Bolton; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  Effects of visceral inputs on the processing of labyrinthine signals by the inferior and caudal medial vestibular nuclei: ramifications for the production of motion sickness.

Authors:  Milad S Arshian; Sonya R Puterbaugh; Daniel J Miller; Michael F Catanzaro; Candace E Hobson; Andrew A McCall; Bill J Yates
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dependence of adaptation of the human vertical angular vestibulo-ocular reflex on gravity.

Authors:  Sergei B Yakushin; Antonella Palla; Thomas Haslwanter; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Responses of caudal vestibular nucleus neurons of conscious cats to rotations in vertical planes, before and after a bilateral vestibular neurectomy.

Authors:  D M Miller; L A Cotter; N J Gandhi; R H Schor; S P Cass; N O Huff; S G Raj; J A Shulman; B J Yates
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.