Literature DB >> 7471075

Contrasting effects of subtotal enteric bypass, enterectomy, and colectomy on azoxymethane-induced intestinal carcinogenesis.

R C Williamson, F L Bauer, O T Terpstra, J S Ross, R A Malt.   

Abstract

Compensatory hyperplasia after extensive loss of functioning small or large intestine might predispose to the development of neoplasia in the residual adapted bowel. To test this hypothesis, male Fischer rats were randomized to receive 85 to 90% jejunoileal resection or bypass, subtotal colectomy, or no operation (controls). One week later, the first of six weekly s.c. injections of azoxymethane (15 mg/kg/week) was given. At the 36th week postoperatively, mean body weight after enterectomy or colectomy it was 78 to 79% of control. Adaptation after all three operations was characterized by 22 to 84% increments in villous height and crypt depth in the residual functioning ileum (p = 0.05 to 0.001); the depth of colonic crypts was unchanged. Fewer rats developed intestinal tumors after enteric bypass (36%) than after any of the other treatments (80 to 91%) (p = 0.01 to 0.001); the depth of colonic crypts was unchanged. Fewer rats developed intestinal tumors after enteric bypass (36%) than after any of the other treatments (80 to 91%) (p = 0.01 to 0.001). Compared with controls, bypass reduced the number of colonic tumors by 77% (p less than 0.001). Although resection did not affect colonic tumor yield, it tripled the incidence of tumors in the duodenum and jejunum (p = 0.025). Colectomy promoted rectal carcinogenesis (p less than 0.05). Anastomotic tumors were commoner after intestinal resection. the lower frequency of tumors after jejunoileal bypass contrasts with enhanced carcinogenesis after enterectomy or colectomy. Profound reduction in body weight may prevent the promotional effect of adaptive hyperplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7471075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  16 in total

1.  Dietary calcium does not reduce experimental colorectal carcinogenesis after small bowel resection despite reducing cellular proliferation.

Authors:  G H Barsoum; H Thompson; J P Neoptolemos; M R Keighley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Rodent models for carcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  A E Rogers; K M Nauss
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Mucosal abnormalities at the anastomosis site in patients who have had intestinal resection for colonic cancer.

Authors:  J P Sunter; M J Higgs; W K Cowan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Diet and bowel cancer.

Authors:  R Williamson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-07-12

5.  Augmentation of chemically induced pancreatic and bronchial cancers by epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  R A Malt; J F Chester; H A Gaissert; J S Ross
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Distal transposition of rat caecum does not render it susceptible to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J B Rainey; M Maeda; R C Williamson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Experimental colonic carcinogenesis: changes in faecal bile acids after promotion of intestinal tumours by small bowel resection in the rat.

Authors:  A P Savage; M S Sian; J L Matthews; S R Bloom; T Cooke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Enteroglucagon and experimental intestinal carcinogenesis in the rat.

Authors:  A P Savage; J L Matthews; M A Ghatei; T Cooke; S R Bloom
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Adenocarcinoma and lymphoma of the small intestine. Distribution and etiologic associations.

Authors:  R C Williamson; C E Welch; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Intestinal adaptation and experimental carcinogenesis after partial colectomy. Increased tumour yields are confined to the anastomosis.

Authors:  R C Williamson; P W Davies; J B Bristol; M Wells
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.