Literature DB >> 7469555

Influence of hiatal hernia on lower esophageal sphincter function.

G B Pettersson, C T Bombeck, L M Nyhus.   

Abstract

Sliding hiatal hernia has long term been implicated as a cause of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) incompetence and gastroesophageal reflux. The physics of LES function in hiatal hernia were investigated in in vitro and in vivo experiments. In vitro models of sliding hernias were constructed from excised canine gastroesophageal specimens. A "sphincter" was simulated with a rubber band around the gastroesophageal junction. It was found that placement of a ligature "hernia ring" on the stomach increased the opening pressure of the model sphincter. Addition of a tissue "hernia sac" sutured to the esophagus above the sphincter further increased the opening pressure, the protective effect being related to the pressure transmitted from the stomach to the hernia sac. There was no fluid leakage from the hernia sac between the hernia ring and the stomach. In anesthetized dogs (in vivo model) gastric and esophageal pressures were measured during gastric infusion while the LES gas way to reflux. A ligature tied loosely around the stomach to simulate a "hernia ring" and a sliding hernia without a hernia sac increased both the opening and the closing pressures of the LES by 36 +/- 18% and 35 +/- 20% (mean +/- SD), respectively. The opening pressure was increased by a decrease in gastric wall tension at the gastroesophageal junction, which was caused by the decreased radius of the herniated portion of the stomach. Pressure transmitted from the stomach to the hernia sac added to the LES pressure, and thereby further increased the opening pressure of the sphincter. The results explain how gastroesophageal reflux may be prevented in patients with hiatal hernia. It was recognized that the hernia sac may protect the sphincter, provided that it inserts into the esophagus above the LES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7469555      PMCID: PMC1345045          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198102000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Effect of increased intraabdominal pressure on lower esophageal sphincter pressure.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; W N Miller; J J Stef; R C Arndorfer; S B Lydon
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-04

2.  THE GASTROESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER IN HIATUS HERNIA.

Authors:  W J WANKLING; W G WARRIAN; J F LIND
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Reflux esophagitis, sliding hiatal hernia, and the anatomy of repair.

Authors:  P R ALLISON
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1951-04

4.  What is a normal esophagogastric junction?

Authors:  B Venkatachalam; L R Da Costa; S K Ip; I T Beck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The dynamics of lower esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  G B Pettersson; C T Bombeck; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr

6.  Clinical and in vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence. A study of the principles of antireflux surgery.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; J A Wernly; G H Bryant; A G Little; D B Skinner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Incidence of sliding hiatus hernia.

Authors:  G W Vestby; T Aakhus
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  A new concept of the mechanism of sphincteric failure in sliding esophageal hiatal hernia.

Authors:  D H Dillard; H N Anderson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1966-05

9.  The effect of vagotomy on human gastroesophageal sphincter pressure in the resting state and following increases in intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  A Csendes; M Oster; O Brandsborg; J T Møller; H Overgaard; M Brandsborg; P Funch-Jensen; E Amdrup
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Intra-abdominal pressure and manometric data of the distal esophageal sphincter. Their relationship to gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J A Wernly; T R DeMeester; G H Bryant; C I Wang; R B Smith; D B Skinner
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-04
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of action of antireflux surgery: theory and fact.

Authors:  A G Little
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D B Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The integrity of esophagogastric junction anatomy in patients with isolated laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; C Kristian Enestvedt; Cedric S F Lorenzo; Paul Schipper; Joshua Schindler; Cynthia D Morris; Katie Nason; James D Luketich; John G Hunter; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Computerized axial manometry of the esophagus. A new method for the assessment of antireflux operations.

Authors:  C T Bombeck; O Vaz; J DeSalvo; P E Donahue; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Review on novel concepts of columnar lined esophagus.

Authors:  Johannes Lenglinger; Stephanie Fischer See; Lukas Beller; Enrico P Cosentini; Reza Asari; Fritz Wrba; Martin Riegler; Sebastian F Schoppmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Clinical findings, diagnostic test results, and treatment outcome in cats with hiatal hernia: 31 cases (1995-2018).

Authors:  Heidi Phillips; Jessica Corrie; Danielle M Engel; Daniel J Duffy; David E Holt; Allison R Kendall; Chad W Schmiedt; Autumn Vetter; Ilyssa L Meren; Christelle Follette; David J Schaeffer; Philipp D Mayhew; Stanley L Marks
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.