Literature DB >> 7468883

Criteria, norms and standards of quality: what do they mean?

A Donabedian.   

Abstract

Quality assessment requires specification of: 1) a set of phenomena that are usually attributes of either process or outcome; 2) a general rule of what constitutes goodness; and 3) a precise numerical statement of what constitutes acceptable or optimal goodness with respect to each of these phenomena. The terms "criteria," "norms," and "standards," as currently employed, do not correspond well with these three components, but they could be used effectively if the basic distinctions were understood. Alternatively, one could use, as corresponding terms, "elements," "parameters," and "standards." The terms "criteria," and "norms" would then be redefined and be available to be used more uniformly, while "standards" could be further differentiated according to method of measurement, configuration, level, and flexibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7468883      PMCID: PMC1619670          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.71.4.409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  1 in total

Review 1.  PSRO and the hospital's control.

Authors:  V N Slee
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 25.391

  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Identifying and managing inappropriate hospital utilization: a policy synthesis.

Authors:  S M Payne
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Training research: practical recommendations for maximum impact.

Authors:  Rinad S Beidas; Kelly Koerner; Kenneth R Weingardt; Philip C Kendall
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-07

4.  Changing to an outcome-focused program improves return to work outcomes.

Authors:  Pamela Joy Tschernetzki-Neilson; E Sharon Brintnell; Calvin Haws; Kathryn Graham
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-06

5.  Psychiatric patients turnaround times in the emergency department.

Authors:  Stefan Kropp; Christoph Andreis; Bert te Wildt; Udo Reulbach; Martin Ohlmeier; Irina Auffarth; Marc Ziegenbein
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2005-12-13

6.  Quality in intensive care units: proposal of an assessment instrument.

Authors:  Alexandre Guilherme Ribeiro de Carvalho; Ana Paula Pierre de Moraes; Lilian Maria Sobreira Tanaka; Renato Vieira Gomes; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-06-26

7.  Whatever can go wrong, need not go wrong: Open Quality approach for epidemiology.

Authors:  Sandra Alba; Masja Straetemans
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-17

8.  Do neurosurgeons need Neuroanesthesiologists? Should every neurosurgical case be done by a Neuroanesthesiologist?

Authors:  Ramsis F Ghaly
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-05-23

Review 9.  Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians.

Authors:  Alan David Kaye; Olutoyin J Okanlawon; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-05-03

10.  Bridging research integrity and global health epidemiology (BRIDGE) statement: guidelines for good epidemiological practice.

Authors:  Sandra Alba; Kristien Verdonck; Annick Lenglet; Susan F Rumisha; Martijn Wienia; Imre Teunissen; Masja Straetemans; Walter Mendoza; Daniel Jeannetot; Daniel Weibel; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Sanjay Juvekar
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.