Literature DB >> 7468176

Internal fixation versus endoprosthesis in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A prospective analysis of the comparative costs and the consumption of hospital resources.

O Søreide, A Alho, D Rietti.   

Abstract

The consumption of hospital resources and the costs involved in treating femoral neck fractures in the elderly were studied and a comparison was made between internal fixation (von Bahr screws) and primary prosthetic replacement (Christiansen's endoprosthesis). The 1-year results of screw fixation were excellent or good in 55% of the patients, fair in 17% and poor in 28%, compared with 79% excellent or good results, 13% fair and 8% poor results in the prosthetic group. As regards the initial stay in hospital, prosthetic replacement was found to be associated with 2.4 times higher costs. This difference was reduced, however, by a more expensive follow-up and more frequent readmissions and reoperations in the internal fixation group. Considering the total costs, prosthetic replacement was found to be 1.6 times more expensive than internal fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7468176     DOI: 10.3109/17453678008990880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  7 in total

1.  The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacement. A randomised study of 146 hips.

Authors:  Torsten Johansson; Margareta Bachrach-Lindström; Per Aspenberg; Dick Jonsson; Ola Wahlström
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  The pathogenesis and treatment of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Lips; K J Obrant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The Thompson prosthesis in the treatment of subcapital fractures of the neck of the femur.

Authors:  A J Tonino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Treatment of the displaced femoral neck fracture, as reflected in Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica.

Authors:  Rolf Onnerfält
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Function of the hip after femoral neck fractures treated by fixation or secondary total hip replacement.

Authors:  L T Nilsson; H Franzén; B Strömqvist; I Wiklund
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The treatment of femoral neck fractures with an isoelastic endoprosthesis implanted without bone cement.

Authors:  E Morscher; R Bombelli; R Schenk; R Mathys
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1981

7.  Functional comparison between uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis with three screws in displaced femoral neck fractures--a matched-pair study of 168 patients.

Authors:  Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.