Literature DB >> 7459218

Prognostic features in the third MRC myelomatosis trial. Medical Research Council's Working Party on Leukaemia in Adults.

.   

Abstract

This paper reports the prognostic significance of clinical and laboratory features recorded at presentation in 485 patients entered into the Medical Research Council's 3rd therapeutic trial in myelomatosis between July 1975 and August 1978. The data were complete up to 1 January 1980, with a median follow-up time of 36 months. The 3 major determinants of prognosis were the blood urea concentration (BUC), the haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]), and the clinical performance status. Three prognostic groups based on these determinants were specified. The groups contained 22%, 56% and 22% of the patients and gave 2-year survival probabilities of 76%, 50% and 9% respectively. Patients in the good-prognosis group had a BUC less than or equal to 8 mM. [Hb] greater than or equal to 100 g/l, and no or minimal symptoms. Those in the poor-prognosis group had either [Hb] less than or equal to 75 g/l or a BUC greater than 10 mM and restricted clinical activity. Patients who had combinations of the 3 determinant features which excluded them from these 2 groups were classified into an intermediate prognosis group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7459218      PMCID: PMC2010574          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1980.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: a retrospective study using conventional statistical methods and a computer program.

Authors:  Y Matzner; J Benbassat; A Polliack
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.195

2.  Light chain isotype-associated suppression of normal plasma cell numbers in patients with multiple myeloma: Medical Research Council's Working Party for Leukaemia in Adults and the Oxford Lymphoma Group.

Authors:  R C Leonard; I C MacLennan; Y Smart; R I Vanhegan; J Cuzick
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1979-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Alexanian; S Balcerzak; J D Bonnet; E A Gehan; A Haut; J S Hewlett; R W Monto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Immunoglobulin synthesis and total body tumor cell number in IgG multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S E Salmon; B A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival.

Authors:  B G Durie; S E Salmon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Clinical staging in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R K Woodruff; J Wadsworth; J S Malpas; J S Tobias
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  The albumin and monoclonal protein ratio as prognostic marker for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Katalin Kádár; Krisztina Wolf; Judit Tábori; István Karádi; Judit Várkonyi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: role of beta 2-microglobulin and thymidine kinase.

Authors:  H Diem; A Fateh-Moghadam; R Lamerz
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1993-11

3.  The implication of compromised renal function at presentation in myeloma: similar outcome in patients who receive high-dose therapy: a single-center study of 251 previously untreated patients.

Authors:  B Sirohi; R Powles; J Mehta; J Treleaven; N Raje; S Kulkarni; C Rudin; N Bhagwati; C Horton; R Saso; S Singhal; R Parikh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  [Analysis of prognostic factors in plasmacytoma].

Authors:  W Gassmann; T Haferlach; N Schmitz; W Kayser; H H Euler; J Drews; H Löffler
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1984-10-01

5.  Bortezomib: the evidence of its clinical impact in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Simon Lancaster
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2006-06-30

Review 6.  Evolving treatment strategies for myeloma.

Authors:  G J Morgan; F E Davies
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Concomitant factors leading to an atypical osteonecrosis of the jaw in a patient with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jaume Miranda-Rius; Lluís Brunet-Llobet; Eduard Lahor-Soler; Josep Anton Giménez-Rubio
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-07-16

Review 8.  The Evolution of Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Amr Hanbali; Mona Hassanein; Walid Rasheed; Mahmoud Aljurf; Fahad Alsharif
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Survival rate of multiple myeloma patients in Indonesia: A retrospective study in multiple myeloma at a single institution.

Authors:  Achmad Fauzi Kamal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-04-02

10.  Is the International Staging System superior to the Durie-Salmon staging system? A comparison in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant.

Authors:  P N Hari; M-J Zhang; V Roy; W S Pérez; A Bashey; L B To; G Elfenbein; C O Freytes; R P Gale; J Gibson; R A Kyle; H M Lazarus; P L McCarthy; G A Milone; S Pavlovsky; D E Reece; G Schiller; J Vela-Ojeda; D Weisdorf; D Vesole
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.528

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.