Literature DB >> 7444762

Optimal preparation techniques for human saphenous vein grafts.

S R Gundry, M Jones, T Ishihara, V J Ferrans.   

Abstract

Endothelial damage during preparation of saphenous vein grafts is an important cause of early and late graft failure. To determine optimal preparation techniques for human saphenous veins (SVs), we made a scanning electron microscopic comparison of the effects of handling techniques, immersion media, and distention pressures on human SV morphology. Segments of SVs from 30 patients were divided into seven groups of five veins each. The effects of both blood and saline solution immersion at 4 degrees and 28 degrees C, 100 and 300 mm Hg distention pressures, and trauma from surgical instrumentation were examined. All groups of veins were fixed by perfusion with glutaraldehyde at 100 mm Hg to simulate arterial pressure and were examined with a scanning electron microscope. SVs immersed in warm saline solution showed massive endothelial cell loss, whereas SVs immersed in warm blood showed only moderate endothelial damage. Cold blood and saline immersion fully preserved endothelium; however, cold saline immersion produced mural edema. Distention to 300 mm Hg with saline solution produced severe endothelial damage and edema, an effect lessened by blood distention. Vascular clamping destroyed endothelium and fractured the intima and media. Marked luminal stenoses were caused by four of seven side branch ties that appeared normal externally. We conclude that human SVs are preserved best by a "no touch" harvesting technique in which manipulation is minimized, side branch ties are placed away from the SV wall, veins are immersed in cold blood, and distention above 100 mm Hg is avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7444762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

Review 1.  Storage of saphenous vein grafts prior to coronary artery bypass grafting: is autologous whole blood more effective than saline in preserving graft function?

Authors:  Maria Tsakok; Sarah Montgomery-Taylor; Teresa Tsakok
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-29

2.  Extensive deendothelialization and thrombogenicity in routinely prepared vein grafts for coronary bypass operations: facts and remedy.

Authors:  Dominik R Weiss; Gerd Juchem; Bernhard M Kemkes; Brigitte Gansera; Stephan Nees
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-05-28

3.  Does No-Touch Technique Better than Conventional or Intermediate Saphenous Vein Harvest Techniques for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Elshafay; Ahmed Hesham Bendary; Huan Thanh Vuong; Ahmed Reda Ahmed; Mohamed Ashraf Mokhtar; Ali Lotfy Soliman; Nguyen Lam Vuong; Israa Atia El Bestawi; Nirmeen Atef Abdallah; Vi Tuong Vu; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Coronary artery bypass surgery: current practice in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  G D Angelini; A J Bryan; R R West; A C Newby; I M Breckenridge
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Preparation of venous allografts. A comparison of techniques.

Authors:  S C Balderman; M Montes; K Schwartz; T Hart; J N Bhayana; A A Gage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Vein contraction and smooth muscle cell extensions as causes of endothelial damage during graft preparation.

Authors:  F G Baumann; F P Catinella; J N Cunningham; F C Spencer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Vein graft preservation solutions, patency, and outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: follow-up from the PREVENT IV randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; John H Alexander; Phillip J Schulte; Colleen M Brophy; Michael J Mack; Eric D Peterson; Judson B Williams; C Michael Gibson; Robert M Califf; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Robert A Harrington; T Bruce Ferguson; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 8.  Saphenous vein grafts in contemporary coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Etem Caliskan; Domingos Ramos de Souza; Andreas Böning; Oliver J Liakopoulos; Yeong-Hoon Choi; John Pepper; C Michael Gibson; Louis P Perrault; Randall K Wolf; Ki-Bong Kim; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Saphenous vein endothelial cell viability: a comparative study of endoscopic and open saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  S J Alrawi; R Raju; G Alshkaki; A J Acinapura; J N Cunningham
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.