Literature DB >> 7444146

Clinical correlations of drug sensitivity in the human tumor stem cell assay.

S E Salmon, D S Alberts, B G Durie, F L Meyskens, S E Jones, B Soehnlen, H S Chen, T Moon.   

Abstract

We have applied an in vitro soft-agar tumor-colony assay (which is now applicable to a variety of human cancers) to measurement of in vitro sensitivity to drugs and prediction of clinical response to cancer chemotherapy. The assay predicts drug resistance with 96% accuracy and sensitivity (in healthy pretreated patients) with 62% accuracy. On a pharmacokinetic basis the zone in vitro sensitivity for any given drug was only 5%-10% of the clinical concentration-time product (Cxt) achievable. This suggests that intratumoral drug concentrations in vivo may be lower than those in the plasma, and/or that > 2 log kills of tumor stem cells (not measurable in the assay) are required for clinical response. Serial in vitro studies showed that acquisition of drug resistance is a common clinical phenomenon which can be directly detected and quantitated in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7444146     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81488-4_36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res        ISSN: 0080-0015


  13 in total

1.  Intracellular concentrations of anti cancer drugs in leukemic cells in vitro vs in vivo.

Authors:  B Sundman-Engberg; U Tidefelt; J Liliemark; C Paul
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  The multiplication of analogs, the best strategy for rapid extension of the oncostatic arsenal. How can they be compared experimentally?

Authors:  G Mathé; C Jasmin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Pharmacologic studies of anticancer drugs with the human tumor stem cell assay.

Authors:  D S Alberts; S E Salmon; H S Chen; T E Moon; L Young; E A Surwit
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  The Cancer BioChip System: a functional genomic assay for anchorage-independent three-dimensional breast cancer cell growth.

Authors:  Rula A Abbud-Antaki; Joie N Marhefka; Aimee L DeLuca; Michael P Zuromskis
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 5.  Murine models to evaluate novel and conventional therapeutic strategies for cancer.

Authors:  James E Talmadge; Rakesh K Singh; Isaiah J Fidler; Avraham Raz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Activity of a recombinant transforming growth factor-alpha-Pseudomonas exotoxin hybrid protein against primary human tumor colony-forming units.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; M H Marshall; D C Heimbrook; S M Stirdivant; J D Ahern; W K Herbert; R Z Maigetter; A Oliff
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 7.  The human tumor cloning assay in cancer drug development. A review.

Authors:  P Agre; T E Williams
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Cytotoxic activity of the thioether phospholipid analogue BM 41.440 in primary human tumor cultures.

Authors:  D B Herrmann; H A Neumann
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.880

9.  Quantitative association between the in vitro human tumor stem cell assay and clinical response to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  T E Moon; S E Salmon; C S White; H S Chen; F L Meyskens; B G Durie; D S Alberts
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Prediction of response to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  M F Sarosdy; D D Von Hoff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.