| Literature DB >> 7440959 |
L P Pertschuk, E H Tobin, P Tanapat, E Gaetjens, A C Carter, N D Bloom, R J Macchia, K B Eisenberg.
Abstract
Histochemical analyses estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors in breast cancer were statistically correlated with results of dextran-coated charcoal (DDC) and sucrose gradient assays. Correlated for ER was 91% of 363 cases, and for PgR 88% of 255 specimens. Breast cancer ER/PgR positivity by histochemistry correlated with a favorable clinical response to endocrine therapies in 72% of 25 cases, while ER/PgR negativity correlated with a lack of response in 96% of 22 cases with Stage IV disease. Nuclear ER/PgR correlated with a poor response to therapy in 8 of 12 patients. An in vitro technique to detect nuclear translocation of ER revealed two groups of ER positive cases, with 11 of 17 exhibiting translocation and 6 not displaying translocation. In prostatic carcinoma, 72% of 65 men were positive for ER and/or androgen receptor. Comparison of specimens obtained without and with electrocautery revealed a preponderance of nuclear binding in the latter, suggesting heat-induced nuclear translocation of receptor. coumestrol, a naturally fluorescent, entirely unaltered estrogen was also used for histochemical detection of ER. Results correlated with ER by DCC in 87% of 61 breast cancers. Coumestrol was additionally used to visually observe receptor and nuclear translocation of ER in intact whole cells in culture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1980 PMID: 7440959 DOI: 10.1177/28.8.7440959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Histochem Cytochem ISSN: 0022-1554 Impact factor: 2.479