Literature DB >> 7437755

Hospital work load produced by breast-cancer screening programme run by trained non-medical staff.

W D George, R A Sellwood, D A Asbury, G Hartley.   

Abstract

In a feasibility study of mass population screening for breast cancer by annual clinical examination and mammography the findings of non-medical staff (nurses and radiographers) were used to estimate the hospital work load generated by such a programme. Among 2490 women who attended for the first time by invitation the rate of referral for a surgical opinion based on the findings of the non-medical staff was 7.9% and the biopsy rate 2.5%. In the second and third years referral rates fell to 4.3% and 2.7% respectively and the biopsy rates to 1.1% and 1.4%. The rates of referral and biopsy among 1203 women who referred themselves for screening were higher, but many self-referred women were symptomatic; those without symptoms had rates of referral and biopsy similar to those of the invited women. Extrapolation of these findings to a population of 200,000 in a typical health district showed that the hospital work load would be high in the first year of screening with 44 outpatient referrals per week and 14 biopsies. By the third year, however, only seven referrals and four biopsies a week could be expected. The work load would be reduced by a third if screening were confined to women over the age of 50.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7437755      PMCID: PMC1714138          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.281.6241.653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  11 in total

1.  Mass-screening of a female population for detection of early carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  S Jakobsson; B Lundgren; O Melander; T Norin
Journal:  Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Implications of suspicious findings in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  J D Lewis; J R Milbrath; K A Shaffer; T K Das Gupta
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-08

3.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  W D George; E N Gleave; P C England; M C Wilson; R A Sellwood; D Asbury; G Hartley; P G Barker; P Hobbs; J Wakefield
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-09

4.  The early diagnosis of breast cancer. A further report for a Women's Screening Unit.

Authors:  J B Davey; H Pentney; A M Richter
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1974-09

5.  The screening of well women for the early detection of breast cancer using clinical examination with thermography and mammography.

Authors:  A M Stark; S Way
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Mammography as a screening method for the examination of large populations.

Authors:  A H Dowdy; W F Barker; L D Lagasse; L Sperling; L J Zeldis; W P Longmire
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Screening for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  W A Griesbach
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  On the diagnosis of minimal breast cancer in a screenee population.

Authors:  M Moskowitz; S Pemmaraju; J A Fidler; D J Sutorius; P Russell; P Scheinok; J Holle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Validity of clinical examination and mammography as screening tests for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; P Rogers; J L Price; S Ginks; B E Nathan; I Burn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunization by intradermal jet injection.

Authors:  J P Stanfield; P M Bracken; K M Waddell; D Gall
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-04-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer: current status, problems, prospects.

Authors:  J E Devitt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A nurse-delivered intervention to reduce barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening in Chicago inner city clinics.

Authors:  D Ansell; L Lacey; S Whitman; E Chen; C Phillips
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  How breast cancer presents.

Authors:  J E Devitt
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.