Literature DB >> 7435899

Spinal analgesia for instrumental delivery. A comparison with pudendal nerve block.

C J Hutchins.   

Abstract

One hundred and eighty-three patients undergoing instrumental delivery were randomly divided into two groups, one of which received low spinal anaesthesia and the other pudendal nerve block for delivery. Both were administered by the operator. No patient who received spinal anaesthesia experienced pain. 62% of patients who had a rotational delivery under pudendal nerve block experienced severe pain; 15% had pain during direct delivery. Hypotension was not observed. The incidence of postnatal complications was similar in each group. Low spinal anaesthesia in the hands of the operator provided superior anaesthesia with no increase in complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7435899     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb05122.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  5 in total

1.  Kielland or Caesar?

Authors:  J O Drife
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-30

2.  Kiellands forceps delivery.

Authors:  S Sheerin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-10

3.  Use of pudendal nerve block among midwives in Norway: A national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mirjam Lukasse; Alette B Bratsberg; Katrine Thomassen; Ellen A Nøhr
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-06-07

Review 4.  Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Natalia Novikova; Catherine Cluver
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

5.  Effect of New Peripudendal Block (PPB) in the Second Stage of Labour on Perineal Relaxation and on the Reduction of Episiotomy Rate: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Artur Beke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2022-03-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.