Literature DB >> 7433985

Specific reading disability: differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency.

W J Lovegrove, A Bowling, D Badcock, M Blackwood.   

Abstract

Contrast thresholds for sine-wave gratings of spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 12, and 16 cycles per degree were determined for normal and disabled readers at a range of stimulus durations. Normal readers demonstrated monotonically decreasing sensitivity with increasing spatial frequency at exposure durations between 40 and 100 milliseconds. At exposure durations of 150 to 1000 milliseconds, they showed peak sensitivity at 4 cycles per degree. In comparison, disabled readers showed monotonically decreasing sensitivity with increasing spatial frequency at all stimulus durations. The difference in sensitivity pattern across spatial frequencies was greatest at stimulus durations approximately equal to fixation durations during reading.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7433985     DOI: 10.1126/science.7433985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  51 in total

1.  Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from functional MRI.

Authors:  E Temple; R A Poldrack; A Protopapas; S Nagarajan; T Salz; P Tallal; M M Merzenich; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Development of population receptive fields in the lateral visual stream improves spatial coding amid stable structural-functional coupling.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Alexis Drain; Brianna Jeska; Vaidehi S Natu; Michael Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Current perspectives on the cerebellum and reading development.

Authors:  Travis A Alvarez; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Postural control in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Maria Pia Bucci
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Poor binocular coordination of saccades in dyslexic children.

Authors:  Maria Pia Bucci; Dominique Brémond-Gignac; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

Review 8.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Mutation of the dyslexia-associated gene Dcdc2 impairs LTM and visuo-spatial performance in mice.

Authors:  L A Gabel; I Marin; J J LoTurco; A Che; C Murphy; M Manglani; S Kass
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  When all hypotheses are right: a multifocal account of dyslexia.

Authors:  Cyril Pernet; Jesper Andersson; Eraldo Paulesu; Jean Francois Demonet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.