Literature DB >> 742655

Accommodation dynamics I. Range nonlinearity.

D Shirachi, J Liu, M Lee, J Jang, J Wong, L Stark.   

Abstract

We show the presence of a new nonlinearity in accommodation dynamics. Positive accommodation is slower when the eye is operating in the near range; conversely, relaxation of accommodation is apparently slower during work in the far range. Latency of accommodation is unaffected by working range. This new dynamic range nonlinearity has been defined in connection with a continuing research study of accommodation responses in normal subjects and in clinic patients. Instrumentation and analysis procedures are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 742655     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197809000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  10 in total

1.  Dynamics of the near response under natural viewing conditions with an open-view sensor.

Authors:  Emmanuel Chirre; Pedro Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Grazyna M Tondel; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Adrian Glasser; Ruth E Manny; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Influence of amplitude, starting point, and age on first- and second-order dynamics of Edinger-Westphal-stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Martin Baumeister; Mark Wendt; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Quantification of the ciliary muscle and crystalline lens interaction during accommodation with synchronous OCT imaging.

Authors:  Marco Ruggeri; Carolina de Freitas; Siobhan Williams; Victor M Hernandez; Florence Cabot; Nilufer Yesilirmak; Karam Alawa; Yu-Cherng Chang; Sonia H Yoo; Giovanni Gregori; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Effects of pharmacologically manipulated amplitude and starting point on edinger-westphal-stimulated accommodative dynamics in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The sensitivity of the 2- to 4-month-old human infant accommodation system.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Amplitude, Latency, and Peak Velocity in Accommodation and Disaccommodation Dynamics.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; Eleni Papadatou; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Simultaneous Measurement of Objective and Subjective Accommodation in Response to Step Stimulation.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirota; Takeshi Morimoto; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.