Literature DB >> 7425954

Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

D B Hawkins, F L Wightman.   

Abstract

Interaural time just noticeable differences (JNDs) were obtained with a low-frequency (450-550 Hz) and high-frequency (3 750-4 250 Hz) narrow-band noise for 3 normally hearing subjects and 8 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Results for the hearing-impaired subjects were compared to those of the subjects with normal hearing at the same sound pressure level (85 dB SPL) and sensation level (30 dB SL). Although large individual differences were present, when considered as a group, interaural time discrimination for the subjects with sensorineural hearing loss was significantly poorer than that of the normal subjects for both signals at both intensity levels. There was no apparent relationship between configuration of hearing loss and time discrimination, but correlations of +0.8 were found between degree of hearing loss and time JNDs. Normal interaural intensity JNDs were obtained from 2 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss whose time JNDs were very poor, thus providing further evidence against the latency hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7425954     DOI: 10.3109/00206098009070081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  12 in total

1.  Revisiting the detection of interaural time differences in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Cochlear hair cell regeneration after noise-induced hearing loss: Does regeneration follow development?

Authors:  Fei Zheng; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory and visual orienting responses in listeners with and without hearing-impairment.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; David McShefferty; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of Hearing Loss on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity at Low and High Frequencies.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Lucas S Baltzell; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

6.  Head, Neck, and Eye Movements That Modulate Tinnitus.

Authors:  Richard Simmons; Christina Dambra; Edward Lobarinas; Christine Stocking; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2008-11

7.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Anna C Diedesch; Sean D Kampel; Kasey M Jakien
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Intra- and interhemispheric white matter tract associations with auditory spatial processing: Distinct normative and aging effects.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Mark A Eckert; Jens H Jensen; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Auditory Spatial Discrimination and the Mismatch Negativity Response in Hearing-Impaired Individuals.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Yiqing Zheng; Maojin Liang; Fei Zhao; Guangzheng Yu; Yu Liu; Yuebo Chen; Guisheng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.