Literature DB >> 7425702

Stresses of natural versus prosthetic aortic valve leaflets in vivo.

M Thubrikar, W C Piepgrass, J D Deck, S P Nolan.   

Abstract

During normal function of the aortic valve, the aortic leaflets undergo not only cyclic loading and unloading but also cyclic reversal of their curvature. The stresses induced in the leaflet due to these variations have been computed using a new concept based on the structure of the leaflet. Membrane stresses have been related to the pressure difference across the leaflet and bending stresses to the leaflet curvature. Total stresses were obtained by adding the two stresses. Total stresses in bioprosthetic and synthetic leaflets also were computed using the same approach. In systole, the natural leaflet is subjected to much lower total stress than a bioprosthetic or a synthetic leaflet. The natural leaflet is not subjected to compressive stresses during the cardiac cycle, whereas bioprosthetic and synthetic leaflets must sustain compressive stresses during systole. The differences in stress patterns of these leaflets indicate that there is a difference in their longevity.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7425702     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)61250-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

Review 1.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Salma Ayoub; Giovanni Ferrari; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Frederick J Schoen; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Development and in vitro assessment of a new two-leaflet replacement heart valve designed using computer-generated bubble surfaces.

Authors:  D K Walker; L N Scotten; D E Hewgill; R G Racca; R T Brownlee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valve failure using a matrix-fibril shear stress transfer approach.

Authors:  Afshin Anssari-Benam; Asa H Barber; Andrea Bucchi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Tissue-Engineered Heart Valves: A Call for Mechanistic Studies.

Authors:  Kevin M Blum; Joseph D Drews; Christopher K Breuer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Maturation of heart valve cell populations during postnatal remodeling.

Authors:  Alexia Hulin; Luis Hortells; M Victoria Gomez-Stallons; Anna O'Donnell; Kashish Chetal; Mike Adam; Patrizio Lancellotti; Cecile Oury; S Steven Potter; Nathan Salomonis; Katherine E Yutzey
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 7.  Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  On the biomechanics of heart valve function.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; W David Merryman; David E Schmidt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Uncoupling the Vicious Cycle of Mechanical Stress and Inflammation in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Nalin H Dayawansa; Sara Baratchi; Karlheinz Peter
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 10.  Materials and manufacturing perspectives in engineering heart valves: a review.

Authors:  F Oveissi; S Naficy; A Lee; D S Winlaw; F Dehghani
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2019-12-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.