Literature DB >> 7422456

The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement.

G Mather.   

Abstract

At present the only widely accepted explanation for the movement aftereffect is Sutherland's so-called ratio model, which states that motion is coded by taking the ratio between the outputs of detectors tuned to opposite directions. However, as yet there have been few attempts to derive predictions from the model in the context of movement aftereffects and test them experimentally. This paper reportws experiments which attempt to determine whether such a simple model is sufficient, or requires additional assumptions which recast it in a form more akin to the distribution-shift models used in other domains (which assume comparisons between outputs in the whole population of direction detectors, rather than just those tuned to opposite directions). These experiemtns examined the interactive effects of two simultaneous directions on subsequent aftereffect durations and directions. The results obtained are difficult to explain in terms of a simple ratio model but can be incorporated into a more complex distribution-shift type model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7422456     DOI: 10.1068/p090379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  21 in total

1.  Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  E Hiris; R Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision.

Authors:  C W Clifford; P Wenderoth; B Spehar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hierarchy of direction-tuned motion adaptation in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hyun Ah Lee; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motion aftereffects specific to surface depth order: beyond binocular disparity.

Authors:  Wonyeong Sohn; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; George Mather
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Three-dimensional motion aftereffects reveal distinct direction-selective mechanisms for binocular processing of motion through depth.

Authors:  Thaddeus B Czuba; Bas Rokers; Kyle Guillet; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  A review of visual aftereffects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Steven M Silverstein; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  The effects of adaptation to visual stimuli on the velocity of subsequent ocular following responses.

Authors:  M R Ibbotson; T Maddess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human middle temporal cortex, perceptual bias, and perceptual memory for ambiguous three-dimensional motion.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Ryota Kanai; Vincent Walsh; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Motion aftereffects with rotating ellipses.

Authors:  P Bressan; L Tomat; G Vallortigara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.