Literature DB >> 7421479

Distance running performance and metabolic responses to running in men and women with excess weight experimentally equated.

K J Cureton, P B Sparling.   

Abstract

Metabolic responses to submaximal and maximal treadmill (TM) running and 12-min run performance were measured in 10 female and 10 male adults who regularly engaged in distance running to experimentally investigate the extent to which differences between men and women in metabolic responses to exercise and distance running performance are due to the sex difference in % body fat. The males were studied under two conditions: (1) with normal body weight and (2) with external weight added to the trunk so that the total percent excess weight (% EW) was equal to the % fat of a matched female. Under the added-weight condition, % EW of the males was increased by an average of 7.5%, the mean sex difference in % fat. Equating % EW reduced the mean sex difference in TM run time by 1.3 min (32%) and 12-min run performance by 173 m (30%). These changes in running performance were the result of an average 3.0 ml/min.kg (38%) reduction in the sex difference for the oxygen required per unit fat-free weight (FFW) to run at various submaximal speeds and a 3.9 ml . min-1 . kg-1 (65%) reduction in the sex difference for VO2max expressed relative to the total weight carried. It was concluded that the greater sex-specific, essential body fat of women is one determinant of the sex difference in metabolic responses to running and distance running performance. Because of her greater body fatness, the average woman will utilize more oxygen per unit FFW to run at any given submaximal speed, will have a lower VO2max expressed relative to body weight and, as a result, will maintain a speed on the 12-min run or other similar distance running event which is slower than her male counterpart. Since the sex-specific, essential fat of women cannot be eliminated by diet or training, it provides part of a biological justification for separate distance running performance standards and expectations for men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7421479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  20 in total

1.  A Preliminary Exploration of the Effects of a 6-week Interactive Video Dance Exercise Program in an Adult Population.

Authors:  Anne Mejia-Downs; Stacie J Fruth; Anne Clifford; Stephanie Hine; Jeremy Huckstep; Heidi Merkel; Hilary Wilkinson; Jason Yoder
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2011-12

2.  Sex differences in performance-matched marathon runners.

Authors:  J Helgerud; F Ingjer; S B Strømme
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of rugby union football players.

Authors:  C W Nicholas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Gender Difference in Aerobic Capacity and the Contribution by Body Composition and Haemoglobin Concentration: A Study in Young Indian National Hockey Players.

Authors:  Hanjabam Barun Sharma; Jyotsna Kailashiya
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Level, uphill and downhill running economy values are strongly inter-correlated.

Authors:  Timothy Joseph Breiner; Amanda Louise Ryan Ortiz; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Metabolic response of endurance athletes to training with added load.

Authors:  H Rusko; C C Bosco
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

7.  A comparative study of rural athletes of four states of India.

Authors:  D P Bhatnagar; R Grewal
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Effects of moderate external loading on the aerobic demand of submaximal running in men and 10 year-old boys.

Authors:  A Thorstensson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

Review 9.  Physiological differences between genders. Implications for sports conditioning.

Authors:  D A Lewis; E Kamon; J L Hodgson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Biomechanics and running economy.

Authors:  T Anderson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.