Literature DB >> 7410780

Category norms: a comparison of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms with the responses of adults between the ages of 20 and 80.

D V Howard.   

Abstract

In order to determine whether category norms collected from college students are appropriate for research with older adults, 25 men and 25 women in each of three age groups, Young (20 to 39 years), Middle (40 to 59 years) and Old (60 to 79 years), were asked to produce as many category members as possible for each of 21 categories chosen from those included in the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. The correlations between the responses of the present subjects and Battig and Montague's were high for all three age groups studied. It is concluded that for most of the categories studied here, it is appropriate to use the Battig and Montague norms when choosing stimuli for experiments with middle-aged and elderly adults. Additional analyses revealed that the Old group produced fewer responses per person per category than the Young and Middle groups. Analyses of between-subject variability indicated that the subjects in the Old group were less likely than the younger subjects to produce unique, idiosyncratic responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7410780     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/35.2.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  19 in total

1.  A "concrete view" of aging: event related potentials reveal age-related changes in basic integrative processes in language.

Authors:  Hsu-Wen Huang; Aaron M Meyer; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas; Rina Schul
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Differential age effects on lexical ambiguity resolution mechanisms.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Tracking cognition-health changes from 55 to 95 years of age.

Authors:  Brent J Small; Roger A Dixon; John J McArdle
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

6.  Text processing variables predict the readability of everyday documents read by older adults.

Authors:  Bonnie J F Meyer; Michael Marsiske; Sherry L Willis
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  1993-07-01

7.  Linking biological and cognitive aging: toward improving characterizations of developmental time.

Authors:  Stuart W S MacDonald; Correne A DeCarlo; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  APOE moderates the association between lifestyle activities and cognitive performance: evidence of genetic plasticity in aging.

Authors:  Shannon K Runge; Brent J Small; G Peggy McFall; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Memory for scripts in young and older adults.

Authors:  L L Light; P A Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-09

10.  Quantity and structure of word knowledge across adulthood.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.