Literature DB >> 7405972

The pre-ejection period as an antepartum indicator of fetal well-being.

L W Organ, A Bernstein, P A Hawrylyshyn.   

Abstract

A preliminary study was made of the potential usefulness of the pre-ejection period (PEP) as an antepartum indicator of fetal well-being. PEP was evaluated in 108 subjects over a 2-year period. It is essential to correct for the effects of heart rate and gestational age on PEP before attempting to relate it ot fetal status. From the control group of 95 fetuses within our study, an equation to correct PEP to a standard heart rate of 140 beats per minute and gestational age of 40 weeks was derived: PEP140,40 = PEP + 0.36(FHR-140) + 1.4(40-GA). PEP140,40 for our control group was 72.9 +/- 2.8 msec. Of the 13 fetuses classified as abnormal in the study, four had a normal PEP140,40 eight showed significant shortening, and one had significant prolongation. These changes in PEP were related to underlying fetal status, and, when used together with other parameters of antenatal assessment, appear to be useful in predicting the ability of the fetus to withstand stress compatible with survival. Continuing evaluation on larger populations will be required to confirm the results of this study. The use of PEP140,40 is suggested as a valid method for comparing reports from different investigators.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7405972     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90890-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of left ventricular pre-ejection period in the fetus using simultaneous magnetocardiography and echocardiography.

Authors:  Nana Aba Mensah-Brown; Ronald T Wakai; Bageshree Cheulkar; Shardha Srinivasan; Janette F Strasburger
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 2.  Cardiotocography and beyond: a review of one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound application in fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  The information content of Doppler ultrasound signals from the fetal heart.

Authors:  S A Shakespeare; J A Crowe; B R Hayes-Gill; K Bhogal; D K James
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Editorial: Recent Advances in Doppler Signal Processing and Modeling Techniques for Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Ahsan H Khandoker; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Yoshitaka Kimura
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Investigating myocardial performance in normal and sick fetuses by abdominal Doppler signal derived indices.

Authors:  Ahsan H Khandoker; Haitham M Al-Angari; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Yoshitaka Kimura
Journal:  Curr Res Physiol       Date:  2021-02-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.