Literature DB >> 7401710

A comparison of contract-managed and traditionally managed nonprofit hospitals.

E L Biggs, J E Kralewski, G D Brown.   

Abstract

During the past five years, contract management of nonprofit hospitals by for-profit corporations has increased markedly. However, while a number of studies have been conducted on investor-owned hospitals and proprietary hospital systems, contract-managed hospitals have not been evaluated systematically. This paper reports a pilot study which compares a sample of 32 nonprofit hospitals under management contracts with matched hospitals uneder traditional in-house management. Although few major differences were found between the study hospitals, the findings indicate that contract-managed hospitals tend to offer a somewhat broader range of services, especially in the outpatient area, younger, more highly educated administrators, and show lower cost per patient stay largely due to somewhat lower employee-to-bed and payroll-to-total expense ratios and shorter lengths of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7401710     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198006000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  4 in total

1.  Financial characteristics of hospitals purchased by investor-owned chains.

Authors:  M J McCue; R W Furst
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A taxonomic analysis of multihospital systems.

Authors:  B L Lewis; J Alexander
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Hospital contract management. Organizational and public policy issues.

Authors:  T G Rundall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Effects of contract management on hospital performance.

Authors:  J E Kralewski; B Dowd; L Pitt; E L Biggs
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.