Literature DB >> 7400354

Progression and regression of cervical lesions. Review of smears from women followed without initial biopsy or treatment.

A I Spriggs, M M Boddington.   

Abstract

Cervical smears were reviewed from patients in whom a cytological abnormality was followed, after an interval without interference, either by regression to ;negative' or else by progression to invasive carcinoma. Twenty-eight cases were from a previously analysed series with positive smears and an interval of at least two years before investigation, resulting from refusal or failure to trace. Slides were also reviewed from 25 cases in which ;positive' smears had regressed to negative without escaping from surveillance, and from 10 patients subsequently developing invasive carcinoma whose previous slides, taken several years earlier, showed abnormalities on review. None of these 63 patients had any biopsy or other surgical procedure to the cervix between the initial smear and the outcome. Slides showing ;superficial cell dyskaryosis' and/or well-differentiated ;parabasal cell dyskaryosis' were found only among the groups with subsequent regression. Those showing dissociated poorly differentiated dyskaryotic parabasal cells regressed to negative in two cases and progressed to invasion in nine. This suggests that many examples of spontaneous regression correspond to mild dysplasias which are not precancerous, and overdiagnosis must often have resulted in unnecessary surgical procedures in the past.;Regressing' and ;progressing' groups both included cases in which the spatula had removed coherent pieces of undifferentiated epithelium. These are difficult to interpret cytologically. In nine of them (including four which regressed) the cytological picture was that of carcinoma in situ. The remainder (14 cases) were probably examples of reserve cell hyperplasia, and it is noteworthy that, of the 21 cases subsequently progressing to invasive carcinoma, five were preceded by appearances of this type. It is concluded that cell aggregates suggesting an unusual degree of reserve cell hyperplasia are a danger signal and require careful surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7400354      PMCID: PMC1146134          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.33.6.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  16 in total

1.  Dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  W M Christopherson
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Relationship of herpes simplex virus type-2 antibodies and squamous dysplasia to cervical carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  D B Thomas; W E Rawls
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Dysplasia. A real concept or a misnomer?

Authors:  L G Koss
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  An epidemiologic study of carcinoma in situ and squamous dysplasia of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  D B Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  A follow-up study of patients with cervical dysplasia.

Authors:  R M Richart; B A Barron
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Concepts of genesis and development in early cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  W M Christopherson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  The identification of atypical reserve cells in smears of patients with premalignant and malignant changes in the squamous and glandular epithelium of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  M E Beyer-Boon; G W Verdonk
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  Influence of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on the distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R M Richart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Condylomatous lesions of the cervix and vagina. I. Cytologic patterns.

Authors:  A Meisels; R Fortin
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

10.  Women with positive cervical smears but without surgical intervention. A follow-up study.

Authors:  L J Kinlen; A I Spriggs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Correlation of apoptosis with tumour cell differentiation, progression, and HPV infection in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Shoji; M Saegusa; Y Takano; M Ohbu; I Okayasu
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

3.  Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.

Authors:  A Fletcher; N Metaxas; C Grubb; J Chamberlain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-29

Review 4.  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  C H Buckley; E B Butler; H Fox
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Management guidelines for women with normal colposcopy after low grade cervical abnormalities: population study.

Authors:  G R Teale; D D Moffitt; C H Mann; D M Luesley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

6.  Oncosuppressor proteins of fragile sites are reduced in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Enrico Giarnieri; Nicola Zanesi; Arianna Bottoni; Mauro Alderisio; Ankica Lukic; Aldo Vecchione; Vincenzo Ziparo; Carlo Maria Croce; Rita Mancini
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Glutathione S-transferase (placental) as a marker of transformation in the human cervix uteri: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  B J Randall; B Angus; R Akiba; A Hall; A R Cattan; S J Proctor; R A Jones; C H Horne
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  TP53 and PIK3CA gene mutations in adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.

Authors:  Maria Lina Tornesello; Clorinda Annunziata; Luigi Buonaguro; Simona Losito; Stefano Greggi; Franco M Buonaguro
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.