Literature DB >> 7398714

The meaning and measurement of age identity.

L K George, E J Mutran, M R Pennybacker.   

Abstract

Lack of a broader theoretical framework and a relative neglect of measurement issues have hindered many previous studies of age identity. In this paper, a case is made for viewing age identity as a dimension of self-concept and two measurement techniques are empirically compared. The first is a single-item measure in which the individual chooses the age category which best suits him. The second is a semantic differential procedure which involves rating the referents "An Old Person", "A Middle-Aged Person", and "Myself" on identical bipolar adjectives. Data were obtained from 341 men and women, age 47 to 96, residing in central North Carolina. The results support the validity of the semantic differential technique, and also suggest that the two measures tap somewhat different dimensions of age identity. The single-item measure is closely related to chronological age, while the semantic differential is more strongly related to personal and social correlates of aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7398714     DOI: 10.1080/03610738008258364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  4 in total

1.  Young adult identities and their pathways: a developmental and life course model.

Authors:  Janel E Benson; Glen H Elder
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-06-13

2.  Growing up Faster, Feeling Older: Hardship in Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson; Stefanie Mollborn
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2009-03

3.  The implications of adult identity for educational and work attainment in young adulthood.

Authors:  Janel E Benson; Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson; Glen H Elder
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-11-21

4.  Does grandchild care affect ageing satisfaction? Findings based on a nationally representative longitudinal study.

Authors:  Eleanor Quirke; Hans-Helmut König; André Hajek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.