Literature DB >> 7397652

Managing the remaining breast.

H P Leis.   

Abstract

Bilateral breast cancer is discussed as to 1) the criteria for determining whether a cancer in the other breast is primary or metastatic; 2) the incidence of simultaneous and subsequent primary cancers in the second breast and the factors that could account for the reported frequency variance by different authors; 3) the influence that a second primary cancer in the contralateral breast makes on the survival of the patient; 4) the psychologic and physical importance of the remaining breast to the patient; and 5) the management of the other breast using preoperative x-rays and random biopsies as added modalities for detection and reserving prophylactic mastectomy of the remaining breast for those patients at high risk for developing cancer in it with a definition of these risk factors. Forty-two simultaneous primary cancers were found in the other breast in a series of 500 (8.4%) patients undergoing primary therapy for cancer in their first breast of which 19 (45.2%) were invasive, and 23 (54.8%) were non-invasive. Two (0.4%) were detected clinically, 16 (3.2%) by x-rays, and 24 (7.5%) by random biopsies in 321 patients. In a series of 846 patients with potentially curable breast cancer, the absolute ten-year survival rate was 63%. They were operated on before the routine use of preoperative x-rays and random biopsies. Eleven (1.3%) had either clinical or x-ray detected simultaneous cancers in the other breast. Of the remaining 835, 48 had prophylactic mastectomies in which 8 (16.6%) unsuspected cancers were found. In the remaining 787, 70 (8.9%) developed subsequent cancers making a total subsequent rate of 78 of 835 (9.3%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7397652     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46:4+<1026::aid-cncr2820461327>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  The role of mammography in the detection of bilateral primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J G Tinnemans; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; R Holland; R F Van der Sluis; H H De Boer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Second primary breast cancer.

Authors:  O Eremin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-06-25

3.  The surgeon's role in breast cancer: changing concepts.

Authors:  H P Leis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Bilateral breast cancer in northern Alberta: risk factors and survival patterns.

Authors:  P E Burns; K Dabbs; C May; A W Lees; L R Birkett; H J Jenkins; J Hanson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The pattern of diagnosis of a second primary tumor in the breast.

Authors:  E Robinson; G Rennert; R Bar-Deroma; D L Dori; A I Neugut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A contribution to the natural history of breast cancer. V. Bilateral primary breast cancer: incidence, risks and diagnosis of simultaneous primary cancer in the opposite breast.

Authors:  A H Tulusan; G Ronay; H Egger; F Willgeroth
Journal:  Arch Gynecol       Date:  1985

7.  Bilateral breast cancer. Risk reduction by contralateral biopsy.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; G M Senofsky; R E Fechner; D Kaiser; S Lynn; J Paradies
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The contralateral breast at reconstructive surgery after breast cancer operation--a histopathological study.

Authors:  A Ringberg; B Palmer; F Linell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

10.  The value of breast MRI in high-risk patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer to exclude invasive disease in the contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Is there a role to choose wisely patients for sentinel node biopsy?

Authors:  Vivianne Freitas; Pavel Crystal; Supriya R Kulkarni; Sandeep Ghai; Karina Bukhanov; Jaime Escallon; Anabel M Scaranelo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.