Literature DB >> 7392903

Power production by Olympic weightlifters.

J Garhammer.   

Abstract

A new procedure was developed for calculating power production during Olympic lifting movements and comparisons were made with a method previously used. The power output of seven superior lifters was determined during selected phases of the snatch, clean, and jerk, from films taken at the 1975 U.S. National Championships. The values obtained depended on the following variables: vertical change in the bar's mechanical energy from the beginning of a force exertion phase until maximum vertical bar velocity was achieved; work done by the athlete in producing horizontal bar movement; and work done in raising the body's center of gravity. Results showed the expected increase in power with increased bodyweight for a given movement. Values for the jerk drive ranged from 2140 watts in the 56 kg class to 4786 watts for a 110 kg lifter. Heavier lifters exceeded published maximal estimates for human power output during brief exertions. More significant was the high degree of consistency in the rate of work done by any given lifter in movements which were very similar with respect to joint action, but competitively had very different objectives. The procedure should prove useful in detecting problems in lifting movements that result in power outputs which are low relative to those measured for biomechanically equivalent exertions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7392903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  17 in total

1.  Velocity associated characteristics of force production in college weight lifters.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  The exercise-induced growth hormone response in athletes.

Authors:  Richard J Godfrey; Zahra Madgwick; Gregory P Whyte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Growth trend of the quadriceps femoris muscle in junior Olympic weight lifters: an 18-month follow-up survey.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kanehisa; Kazuo Funato; Shinya Kuno; Tetsuo Fukunaga; Shigeru Katsuta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Divergent muscle functional and architectural responses to two successive high intensity resistance exercise sessions in competitive weightlifters and resistance trained adults.

Authors:  Adam Storey; Samantha Wong; Heather K Smith; Paul Marshall
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  The Importance of Muscular Strength in Athletic Performance.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Force-velocity, impulse-momentum relationships: implications for efficacy of purposefully slow resistance training.

Authors:  Brian K Schilling; Michael J Falvo; Loren Z F Chiu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.

Authors:  Adam Storey; Heather K Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Comparative kinematic analysis of the snatch lifts in elite male adolescent weightlifters.

Authors:  Erbil Harbili; Ahmet Alptekin
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Power and work produced in different leg muscle groups when rising from a chair.

Authors:  P Wretenberg; U P Arborelius
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.