Literature DB >> 7388601

Activity of motoneurons during fictitious scratch reflex in the cat.

M B Berkinblit, T G Deliagina, G N Orlovsky, A G Feldman.   

Abstract

(1) Intracellular recording of motoneurons of different hindlimb muscles: tibialis anterior (TA), gastrocnemius and soleus (GS), vastus crureus (Vast), posterior biceps and semitendinosus (PBSt), was carried out during the fictitious scratch reflex in decerebrate cats. (2) During the postural stage of the reflex, a depolarizaiton (3.8 mV on average) was observed in TA motoneurons accompanied by tonic discharge. No change of the membrane potential (MP) and no discharge were observed during this stage in GS, Vast and PBSt motoneurons. (3) In the rhythmical stage of the reflex, the MP of TA motoneurons changed only slightly during the 'long' (L) phase of the scratch cycle and remained at approximately the same level as during the postural stage. In this phase, motoneurons discharged at frequencies of 20-100 pps. In the 'short' (S) phase of the scratch cycle a strong repolarization occurred, the MP reached the same level as observed during resting conditons (MP0), and the discharge discontinued. (4) GS motoneurons were gradually depolarized during the second half of the L-phase. The depolarization reached its maximum (5.5 mV on average in relation to the MP0) on average in relation to the MP0) in the S-phase, and several action potentials were generated with intervals of 5-10 msec. Then, at the beginning of the L-phase, the motoneurons were repolarized and the MP reached the level of the MP0. The behavior of Vast motoneurons was essentially similar to that of GS motoneurons. (5) The PBSt motoneurons usually had two peaks of depolarization per cycle--in the S-phase and at the beginning of the L-phase. The maximal depolarization was 3.5 mV (on average). The motoneurons generated action potentials at one or both peaks of depolarization. (6) The possible organization of the central influences upon motoneurons of different muscles during scratching is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7388601     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90175-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  13 in total

1.  Proprioceptive control of extensor activity during fictive scratching and weight support compared to fictive locomotion.

Authors:  M C Perreault; M Enriquez-Denton; H Hultborn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Motoneurons have different membrane resistance during fictive scratching and weight support.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Perreault
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Spinal functions in sensorimotor control of movements.

Authors:  E D Schomburg
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Evidence for specialized rhythm-generating mechanisms in the adult mammalian spinal cord.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Jean-Pierre Gossard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Threshold control of motor actions prevents destabilizing effects of proprioceptive delays.

Authors:  Jean-François Pilon; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reciprocal Ia inhibition contributes to motoneuronal hyperpolarisation during the inactive phase of locomotion and scratching in the cat.

Authors:  Svend S Geertsen; Katinka Stecina; Claire F Meehan; Jens B Nielsen; Hans Hultborn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Paw-shake responses with joint immobilization: EMG changes with atypical feedback.

Authors:  G F Koshland; J L Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Muscle coactivation: definitions, mechanisms, and functions.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The capacity for generation of rhythmic oscillations is distributed in the lumbosacral spinal cord of the cat.

Authors:  T G Deliagina; G N Orlovsky; G A Pavlova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Influence of Renshaw cells on the response gain of hindlimb extensor muscles to sinusoidal labyrinth stimulation.

Authors:  O Pompeiano; P Wand; U C Srivastava
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.