Literature DB >> 7388567

Aspects of audit. 5: Looking forward to audit.

C D Shaw.   

Abstract

Whatever the misgivings of individual doctors, the formal support being given by professional bodies suggests that medical audit will become established in Britain. It is therefore appropriate to heed the advice of pioneers in the field in choosing methods and topics for audit. Practical problems can be anticipated because of the inadequacy of medical records, retrieval systems, and comparable information on practice patterns and evaluation of traditional processes of patient care. The criterion system of audit may provide a common standard for effective review. This can be used for any group of patients with some characteristic in common. It requires good records and a good records staff. Whatever method is adopted, central support should come from the royal colleges, with community physicians and clinical tutors assisting clinicians at the local level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7388567      PMCID: PMC1601637          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.280.6230.1509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  15 in total

1.  Auditing and evaluation in general practice.

Authors:  K Mourin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1976-10

2.  Medical records, medical audit, and community hospitals.

Authors:  C Kirk; M Lee-Jones
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1976-02

3.  Surgical audit: one year's experience in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  M Irving; J Temple
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

4.  A framework for good primary medical care--the measurement and achievement of quality.

Authors:  C Buck; J Fry; D H Irvine
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-09

5.  Peer review. A study commissioned by the Federal Council of the Australian Medical Association of peer review systems in the United States of America, Canada and West Germany.

Authors:  L L Wilson; N Larkins
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1977-04-02       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Report on the clinical appraisal demonstration project of the Canadian Council on Hospital Accreditation.

Authors:  J H Murray; A L Swanson; C Knauf
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1977-02

7.  Communication as a method of medical audit.

Authors:  I McColl; L C Fernow; C Mackie; M Rendall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Quality of care in general practice: can it be assessed?

Authors:  J L Stevens
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1977-08

9.  Problems and new directions in the evaluation of primary care.

Authors:  I McDowell; C J Martini
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  The state of British medicine--11. Medical audit.

Authors:  L C Fernow; I McColl
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditing and improving notification and chemoprophylaxis in bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  I Harvey; S Kaul; T J Peters
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

3.  Surgical audit: the value of a morbidity and mortality conference.

Authors:  P R O'Connell; W O Kirwan; M P Brady; J A O'Donnell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  A new method of auditing surgical mortality rates: application to a group of elderly general surgical patients.

Authors:  D G Seymour; R Pringle
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-05-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.