Literature DB >> 7388496

Aspects of audit. 1. The background.

C D Shaw.   

Abstract

Methods of reviewing health care already exist in Britain, but the debate continues about how practical and acceptable such a review is. The many different terms used to describe review only confuse the issue. "Audit" is a useful term for describing the review of medical work by medical people. This can be divided into "internal audit," or peer review, and "external audit"--that is, review by organisations outside hospital and general practice. The concepts of internal and external audit have a great impact upon the attitudes held by the medical profession about audit. The shortcomings of audit by the professional standards review organisations in the United States are not inevitable in Britian.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7388496      PMCID: PMC1601529          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.280.6226.1256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  11 in total

1.  Clinical and administrative review in general practice.

Authors:  N C Stott; R H Davis
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1975-12

2.  Medical audit in North America.

Authors:  I R McWhinney
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-04-29

3.  Surgical self-scrutiny.

Authors:  R Y Calne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Nuffield Lecture. Monitoring the National Health Service.

Authors:  R Doll
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1973-08

5.  Recertification and peer review in the United States.

Authors:  J C Rose
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-09

Review 6.  Evaluating the quality of medical care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1966-07

7.  Peer review. A study commissioned by the Federal Council of the Australian Medical Association of peer review systems in the United States of America, Canada and West Germany.

Authors:  L L Wilson; N Larkins
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1977-04-02       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Medical audit in British hospital practice.

Authors:  I McColl
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1979-11

9.  Quality assurance: what now and where next?

Authors:  A Duncan
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-02-02

10.  Self-assessment programmes and aspects of audit.

Authors:  M B Matthews
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1979-07
View more
  11 in total

1.  Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care.

Authors:  S A Buetow; M Roland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

2.  Facilitating quality improvement in primary health care by practice visiting.

Authors:  G Eliasson; L Berg; P Carlsson; K Lindström; C Bengtsson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-03

3.  The audit process and medical organisation.

Authors:  T Packwood; S Kerrison; M Buxton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

Review 4.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

5.  How have recent changes in the NHS affected perinatal audit?

Authors:  M Mugford; J Chapple
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  A new method of auditing surgical mortality rates: application to a group of elderly general surgical patients.

Authors:  D G Seymour; R Pringle
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-05-22

7.  Use of microcomputers for self-assessment and continuing education in anaesthesia.

Authors:  C Schmulian; G N Kenny; D Campbell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-02-06

8.  Audit and improvement of performance: is pathology a special case?

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-07-19

9.  Medical audit in general practice. Butterworth Prize Essay 1981.

Authors:  M G Sheldon
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap       Date:  1982

10.  Conditions and barriers for quality improvement work: a qualitative study of how professionals and health centre managers experience audit and feedback practices in Swedish primary care.

Authors:  Eva Arvidsson; Sofia Dahlin; Anders Anell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.