Literature DB >> 7387972

Observer variation in ophthalmology.

R A Gibson, H F Sanderson.   

Abstract

Data collected by clinicians and nurses from patients with clinically diagnosed lens opacities revealed that there was poor repeatability of the description of the position of lens opacities, statistically significant observer variation in determining visual acuity, and good repeatability as to what visual tasks the patient can perform. It is suggested that clinicans should give more weight to the visual handicap revealed by performance of visual tasks in making a decision for cataract surgery than at present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7387972      PMCID: PMC1043728          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.64.6.457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Randomized controlled clinical trial. National Eye Institute workshop for ophthalmologists. Standardizing diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  H A Kahn; H Leibowitz; J P Ganley; M Kini; T Colton; R Nickerson; T R Dawber
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Observers' errors in taking medical histories.

Authors:  A L COCHRANE; P J CHAPMAN; P D OLDHAM
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1951-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Indications for cataract surgery. Psycholinguistic considerations.

Authors:  W W Wong
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-03

4.  Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population.

Authors:  F C Hollows; P A Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total
  19 in total

1.  Objective measurement of human visual acuity by visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A K Kharauzov; S V Pronin; A F Sobolev; S A Koskin; E V Boiko; Yu E Shelepin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-11

Review 2.  [Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) visual acuity].

Authors:  R Told; M Baratsits; G Garhöfer; L Schmetterer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a classification scheme for corneal topographic patterns.

Authors:  K Rasheed; Y S Rabinowitz; D Remba; M J Remba
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The Eye Phone Study: reliability and accuracy of assessing Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology.

Authors:  C Perera; R Chakrabarti; F M A Islam; J Crowston
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comment on the article: multifocal electroretinography in amblyopia.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš; Mladen Bušić; Ana Križanović; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Reply to the letter to the editor: Multifocal electroretinography in amblyopia.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Alaa Bou Ghannam; Elza Rachid
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Reliability of the Snellen chart.

Authors:  P McGraw; B Winn; D Whitaker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-10

8.  Vision related daily life problems in patients waiting for a cataract extraction.

Authors:  M Lundström; G Fregell; A Sjöblom
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Reduction of corneal sensitivity after retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  R A Gibson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Measuring the effectiveness of cataract surgery: the reliability and validity of a visual function outcomes instrument.

Authors:  D J Lawrence; C Brogan; L Benjamin; D Pickard; S Stewart-Brown
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.