Literature DB >> 7381706

Model-independent method of analyzing input in linear pharmacokinetic systems having polyexponential impulse response I: Theoretical analysis.

P V Pedersen.   

Abstract

A rigorous treatment of linear compartmental systems is presented, which allows the input rate of drugs into the systemic circulation to be evaluated without assuming a specific kinetic model. The method allows the input to be evaluated in the presence or absence of any combination of intravenous bolus input and infusion input. Only data for the blood drug concentration are required; there are no requirements for specific sampling times. Applications of the equations are given in several examples. The input rate is evaluated with data obtained from a disposition experiment involving an intravenous bolus or zero-order infusion input and an experiment involving the input to be evaluated. The two experiments can be merged so that the input can be evaluated without a washout period between the two drug administrations. The equations also enable model-independent calculations of the optimal drug input control that produces any desirable drug concentration profile. The approach is a useful deconvolution method for any linear pharmacokinetic system where the impulse response can be approximated by a polyexponential expression.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7381706     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600690314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  17 in total

1.  Indirect pharmacodynamic models for responses with multicompartmental distribution or polyexponential disposition.

Authors:  W Krzyzanski; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Noncompartmental versus compartmental modelling in clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  W R Gillespie
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Flip-flop pharmacokinetics--delivering a reversal of disposition: challenges and opportunities during drug development.

Authors:  Jaime A Yáñez; Connie M Remsberg; Casey L Sayre; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2011-05

4.  Spline functions in convolutional modeling of verapamil bioavailability and bioequivalence. I: conceptual and numerical issues.

Authors:  J Popović
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  A comparison of six deconvolution techniques.

Authors:  F N Madden; K R Godfrey; M J Chappell; R Hovorka; R A Bates
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-06

6.  Estimation of drug absorption rates using a deconvolution method with nonequal sampling times.

Authors:  K Iga; Y Ogawa; T Yashiki; T Shimamoto
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1986-04

7.  Numerical deconvolution using system identification methods.

Authors:  S Vajda; K R Godfrey; P Valko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1988-02

8.  A polyexponential deconvolution method. Evaluation of the "gastrointestinal bioavailability" and mean in vivo dissolution time of some ibuprofen dosage forms.

Authors:  W R Gillespie; P Veng-Pedersen
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1985-06

9.  Linear and nonlinear system approaches in pharmacokinetics: how much do they have to offer? I. General considerations.

Authors:  P Veng-Pedersen
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1988-08

10.  Linear systems approach to the analysis of an induced drug removal process. Phenobarbital removal by oral activated charcoal.

Authors:  W R Gillespie; P Veng-Pedersen; M J Berg; D D Schottelius
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1986-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.