Literature DB >> 7381692

Clearance calculations in hemodialysis: application to blood, plasma, and dialysate measurements for ethambutol.

C S Lee, T C Marbury, L Z Benet.   

Abstract

With the increasing use of artificial kidneys, numerous reports have appeared describing the pharmacokinetics of administered drugs in dialysis patients. Unfortunately, different investigators use different measures of dialysis clearance in reporting their results. Few studies have appeared in which actual measurements have been made in blood and dialysate as well as in plasma to experimentally show the variability of individual measurements and to demonstrate the inaccuracy of certain clearance measurements. We do so here, using the drug ethambutol. The effect of the artificial kidney on the removal of ethambutol was investigated in four uremic patients undergoing chronic hemadialysis. Ethambutol was administered by i.v. infusion over 30 min. Hemodialysis started at the end of drug infusion. Blood, plasma, and dialysate samples were collected periodically over 3 hr and analyzed for ethambutol content. Dialysis clearance was calculated by arterial-venous difference and by simultaneous dialysate measurement. The extraction efficiency of the hollow fiber dialyzers ranged from 36.2% to 43.8% in terms of blood and from 38.0% to 45.4% in terms of plasma. The mean clearance values due to dialysis were 108.08 and 88.1 ml/min measured with plasma and blood as body fluids of reference, respectively. Dialysis clearance calculated by dialysate measurement had a mean of 85.9 ml/min expressed as plasma and 74.7 ml/min expressed as blood. This study demonstrates that dialysis clearance when calculated using A-V difference and plasma flow is generally underestimated, particularly for a drug which extensively partitions into red blood cells. Ethambutol had a partition coefficient (blood/plasma) of greater than 1 in all four patients. The beta phase exhibited a mean half-life of approximately 2 hr on dialysis in comparison to off dialysis half-lives of 7 hr or longer in renal failure. Although ethambutol exhibits a markedly reduced half-life of the drug during hemodialysis, its recovery in the dialysis fluid during a 3-hr dialysis period constitutes only a small fraction of the dose administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7381692     DOI: 10.1007/bf01059449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  10 in total

1.  Dialysance and clearance measurements during clinical dialysis-a plea for standardization.

Authors:  O E Bass; K D Nolph; J F Maher
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1975-09

2.  Evaluation of hemodialysis for ethchlorvynol (Placidyl) overdose.

Authors:  T N Tozer; L D Witt; L Gee; T G Tong; J Gambertoglio
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1974-10

3.  Kinetics of ethambutol elimination in renal disease.

Authors:  T G Christopher; A Blair; A Forrey; R E Cutler
Journal:  Proc Clin Dial Transplant Forum       Date:  1973

4.  [Comparison between renal clearances with inulin and para-aminohippuric acid and blood concentrations of ethambutol].

Authors:  L Anex; G Favez; C Willa
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1972-01-29

5.  Metabolic and special studies of ethambutol in normal volunteers and tuberculous patients.

Authors:  V A Place; E A Peets; D A Buyske; R R Little
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1966-04-20       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Gas-liquid chromatographic determination of ethambutol in plasma and urine of man and monkey.

Authors:  C S Lee; L Z Benet
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1976-11-17

7.  Micro and macro GLC determination of ethambutol in biological fluids.

Authors:  C S Lee; L Z Benet
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  [Pharmacokinetics of ethambutol in healthy individuals and in patients with terminal renal failure].

Authors:  T Dume; C Wagner; E Wetzels
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1971-09-03       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  Kinetics of oral ethambutol in the normal subject.

Authors:  C S Lee; J G Gambertoglio; D C Brater; L Z Benet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Artificial kidneys and clearance calculations.

Authors:  T P Gibson; E Matusik; L D Nelson; W A Briggs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 6.875

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  High haemodialysis clearance of ornidazole in the presence of a negligible renal clearance.

Authors:  F F Horber; O Maurer; P J Probst; E Heizmann; F J Frey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  β-Blocker Dialyzability in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alvin Tieu; Thomas J Velenosi; Andrew S Kucey; Matthew A Weir; Bradley L Urquhart
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  W L St Peter; K A Redic-Kill; C E Halstenson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone (2.0 g) and sulbactam (1.0 g) coadministered to subjects with normal renal function, patients with decreased renal function, and patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.

Authors:  D P Reitberg; D A Marble; R W Schultz; T J Whall; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics of cimetidine and its sulphoxide metabolite during haemodialysis.

Authors:  R Larsson; P Erlanson; G Bodemar; B Norlander; L Fransson; L Strouth
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Disposition and removal of metronidazole in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Authors:  A Somogyi; C Kong; J Sabto; F W Gurr; W J Spicer; A J McLean
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Drug therapy in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  C S Lee; T C Marbury
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Disposition kinetics of ethambutol in man.

Authors:  C S Lee; D C Brater; J G Gambertoglio; L Z Benet
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1980-08

9.  Nonlinear plasma protein binding and haemodialysis clearance of prednisolone.

Authors:  F J Frey; J G Gambertoglio; B M Frey; L Z Benet; W J Amend
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Mezlocillin disposition in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  D M Janicke; A Mangione; R W Schultz; W J Jusko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.