Literature DB >> 7378230

Lumbar extradural injection pressures in pregnant women. An investigation of relationships between rate of infection, injection pressures and extent of analgesia.

R P Husemeyer, D C White.   

Abstract

Before the induction of labour in 34 pregnant women 1.5% lignocaine 10 ml was injected into the lumbar extradural space at constant rates between 0.143 and 0.333 ml s-1. Injection pressures and residual pressures were recorded and the extent of analgesia to pinprick was assessed. No significant correlation was found between the rate of injection and injection pressures or residual pressures over the range investigated. Analgesia was significantly more extensive on the side dependent during injections, but there was no significant correlation between the overall extent of analgesia and the rate of injection, injection pressures or residual pressures in the extradural space. It is concluded that there is no advantage from rapid extradural injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7378230     DOI: 10.1093/bja/52.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  8 in total

1.  Epidural administration and analgesic spread: comparison of injection with catheters and needles.

Authors:  K Omote; A Namiki; H Iwasaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Epidural pressure and its relation to spread of epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Y Hirabayashi; I Matsuda; S Inoue; R Shimizu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1987-09-01       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Spread of epidural analgesia following a constant pressure injection--an investigation of relationships between locus of injection, epidural pressure and spread of analgesia.

Authors:  Y Hirabayashi; I Matsuda; S Inoue; R Shimizu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1987-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a morbidly obese parturient with spinal meningioma.

Authors:  Allison Clark; Neil Digiovanni; Stuart Hart; Melissa Russo; Cuong Bui
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

5.  Inadequate analgesia with lumbar epidural following retroperitoneal dissection.

Authors:  D Thangathurai; M Mikhail; D Fishman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Epidural pressure changes following caudal blockade: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Jessica K Goeller; Anita Joselyn; David P Martin; Tarun Bhalla; Olamide Dairo; Daniel B Herz; Seth A Alpert; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section in a patient with a cervical arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  B Y Ong; J Littleford; R Segstro; D Paetkau; I Sutton
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Epidural loss-of-resistance biomechanics: an open pilot cadaver study.

Authors:  William P McKay; Timothy Rosser; Stefan Kriegler; Adel Mohamed
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2010-09-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.