Literature DB >> 7378213

Echocardiographic comparison of haemodynamic effects of metoprolol and propranolol.

J H Bett, L Dryburgh, D E Hetherington.   

Abstract

Metoprolol (200 mg daily) and propranolol (160 mg daily) were each given for one week to 11 normal subjects. The order of administration was randomized and not known to us during the study. Each period of treatment with active drug was followed by one week during which placebo tablets were taken. M-mode echocardiograms and blood pressure were recorded before entry to the trial, twice during each week of treatment with metoprolol or propranolol, and daily for three days and on the seventh day after stopping the drugs. Septal and posterior wall endocardial echoes were traced with an X-Y digitiser and left ventricular minor axis dimensions derived every 10 ms with a minicomputer. Both drugs reduced heart rate, cardiac output, and blood pressure. Systemic vascular resistance was increased significantly by propranolol, and with both agents was inversely related to heart rate, cardiac output, left ventricular diastolic dimension, and indices of contractility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7378213      PMCID: PMC482338          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.43.5.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  17 in total

1.  Influence of metoprolol and propranolol on hemodynamic effects induced by physical work and isoprenaline.

Authors:  G Johnsson; G Nyberg; L Sölvell
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1975

2.  Influence of metoprolol and propranolol on hemodynamic effects induced by adrenaline and physical work.

Authors:  G Johnsson
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1975

3.  Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy.

Authors:  L E Teichholz; T Kreulen; M V Herman; R Gorlin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function with special reference to normalized velocities.

Authors:  M A Quinones; W H Gaasch; J K Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of ultrasound and cineangiographic measurements of the mean rate of circumferential fiber shortening in man.

Authors:  R H Cooper; R A O'Rourke; J S Karliner; K L Peterson; G R Leopold
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Analysis of left ventricular wall motion by reflected ultrasound. Application to assessment of myocardial function.

Authors:  I G McDonald; H Feigenbaum; S Chang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular dimensions, volumes and performance.

Authors:  J A Murray; W Johnston; J M Reid
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Determination of left ventricular volumes by ultrasound.

Authors:  N J Fortun; W P Hood; M E Sherman; E Craige
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography.

Authors:  J F Pombo; B L Troy; R O Russell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Measurement of peak rates of left ventricular wall movement in man. Comparison of echocardiography with angiography.

Authors:  D G Gibson; D J Brown
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1975-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.