| Literature DB >> 737619 |
Abstract
The alleged benefits of protein diets remain unproven, since research data on the safety and long-term utility of protein products as the principal or only source of nutrients for weight reduction programs are as yet insufficient. First, it is uncertain whether the decreases in body protein turnover occurring with these diets are consistent with normal function over long periods, though net balance of protein is obtained. Second, the main advantage to the patient is the suppression of appetite by the ketoacidosis, but it is the ketoacidosis that causes many of the untoward effects. Third, the addition of carbohydrate to a protein diet does not mitigate the benefit of the protein and prevents most of the untoward effects. Fourth, there is clearly no advantage of "predigested" proteins (which are generally poorer in quality than normal high-protein foods) except for the psychologic factor of being given "medication" for the "disease" of obesity. Fifth, there is a distinct danger of deficiencies of micronutrients developing with prolonged consumption of unsupplemented diets. Sixth, the cardiac disorders associated with death in persons taking these diets have not been shown to be coincidental rather than a direct consequence of the diets.In the present state of understanding of protein diets, they should be supervised only by specially trained physicians in rigorous multidisciplinary programs, preferably those with ongoing research. Only individuals free from contraindications should be so treated. Until compelling data proving the safety and efficacy of these diets are forthcoming, the general public should be counselled against their use.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1978 PMID: 737619 PMCID: PMC1818596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Med Assoc J ISSN: 0008-4409 Impact factor: 8.262