Literature DB >> 7372919

Segmenting speech into words.

R A Cole, J Jakimik, W E Cooper.   

Abstract

Four experiments employed a listening for mispronuciations task to determine how listeners perceive an ordered series of words from a continuous, phonetically ambiguous stimulus. In experiments 1,2, and 3, listeners' reaction times to detect mispronuciations were obtained in phonological sequences that could be perceived as either one or two words (e.g., "cargo" or "car go" mispronounced "carko"). In experiment 1, segmentation of the acoustic signal as one or two words was guided by the theme of a short story. For example, the sentence "They saw the carko on the ferry" was spliced into two stories--one about a shipment of cargo, and one about a car about to go on a ferryboat. The results showed significantly faster reaction times--by about 300 ms--when the mispronunciation was perceived as occurring in the second syllable of a word. In experiment 2, alternate segmentation of the same acoustic signal were constrained by the grammatical nature of the first few words in a sentence. Subjects were presented with sentences such as "The doctor said that nosetrops will help the cold" or "the doctor said he knows trops will help the cold." By means of tape splicing, the final portions of the two sentences in each pair were acoustically identical. Reaction times were again found to be faster--by about 150 ms--when the mispronunciation was perceived as occuring in the second or third syllable of a word, rather than at the beginning of a word. Experiment 3 replicated these results using naturally recorded sentences having normal prosody. The results of experiments 1-3 demonstrated that prior context determines how syllables are recognized as words and that a mispronounced second syllable is detected faster than a mispronounced word-initial syllable. It was argued that mispronunciations are detected more quickly in second syllables because the intended word has been accessed from its first syllable. This hypothesis was further supported in experiment 4. When subjects read each sentence before hearing it, so that all syllables were equally (and perfectly) predictable, mispronunications were detected equally fast in first and second syllables.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7372919     DOI: 10.1121/1.384185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues for speech segmentation.

Authors:  L D Sanders; H J Neville
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Implicit language learning: Adults' ability to segment words in Norwegian.

Authors:  Megan M Kittleson; Jessica M Aguilar; Gry Line Tokerud; Elena Plante; Arve E Asbjørnsen
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2010-10

3.  Brief report: a comparison of statistical learning in school-aged children with high functioning autism and typically developing peers.

Authors:  Jessica Mayo; Inge-Marie Eigsti
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-11

4.  Distortions and deletions: word-initial consonant specificity in fluent speech.

Authors:  L H Small; Z S Bond
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

5.  Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech.

Authors:  Z S Bond; L H Small
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-11

6.  Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Laura C Dilley; J Devin McAuley; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Neural processes underlying statistical learning for speech segmentation in dogs.

Authors:  Marianna Boros; Lilla Magyari; Dávid Török; Anett Bozsik; Andrea Deme; Attila Andics
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  How does context play a part in splitting words apart? Production and perception of word boundaries in casual speech.

Authors:  Dahee Kim; Joseph D W Stephens; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  The growth of lexical constraints on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  A C Walley; J L Metsala
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

10.  Are the products of statistical learning abstract or stimulus-specific?

Authors:  Athena Vouloumanos; Patricia E Brosseau-Liard; Evan Balaban; Alanna D Hager
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.