Literature DB >> 7370845

The relevance to family physicians of core content review: evaluation of a program of continuing education.

W O Spitzer, G L Dickie, M J Bass, R Roberts, F Demanuele, H Stockwell, J Feightner, C Moore, J I Williams, S Skene.   

Abstract

The Core Content Review of Family Medicine was assessed for its relevance to family practice. Three sets of questionnaires were completed and assessed by 48 experienced, certificated family physicians, of whom half were faculty members from university departments of family medicine and half were in private practice. The answers to 57% of the questions were correct. In the opinion of the panelists the answers to 62% of the questions permitted discrimination between physicians providing care of good quality and those providing care that was less than adequate. The panelists rated 78% of the questions as being educationally useful. Two thirds of the questions were deemed relevant according to a composite criterion. Examples are given of the questions considered most relevant and of those considered least relevant.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7370845      PMCID: PMC1801806     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  2 in total

1.  A national self-evaluation program for Canadian family doctors.

Authors:  W W Rosser
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1975-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  What do family physicians see in practice?

Authors:  A M Warrington; D J Ponesse; M E Hunter; D A Grant; A V Grasset; D W Gray; C D Hayward; B F Long; G E Morrison; D Sutherland
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-08-20       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.