Literature DB >> 7370687

Study of information submitted by drug companies to licensing authorities.

E Hemminki.   

Abstract

Reports of clinical trials included in applications submitted by drug companies to licensing authorities in Finland and Sweden in four different years were studied. Many reports were submitted, but most of the trials were uncontrolled and of poor quality. Many of the reports were unpublished, and thus, as the submissions are secret, were not available to doctors. These unpublished reports were in most respects as valuable as the published reports. Most of the reports included some information about adverse effects; the information was often deficient, but skilled analysis might increase its value. This study provides support for those who want to see public disclosure of the reports of trials submitted in licensing applications.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7370687      PMCID: PMC1601011          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.280.6217.833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  28 in total

Review 1.  Manufacturer's drug interaction and postmarketing adverse event data: what are appropriate uses?

Authors:  W K Kraft; S A Waldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Karmela Krleza-Jerić; Isabelle Schmid; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO.

Authors:  Kay Dickersin; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Journal notes.

Authors:  W K Beatty
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1981-01

Review 5.  Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.

Authors:  Anders W Jørgensen; Jørgen Hilden; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-06

6.  Misconduct in medical research.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-28

Review 7.  Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review.

Authors:  Natalie McGauran; Beate Wieseler; Julia Kreis; Yvonne-Beatrice Schüler; Heike Kölsch; Thomas Kaiser
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Report on a pilot project to introduce a publications officer.

Authors:  Kelly D Cobey; James Galipeau; Larissa Shamseer; David Moher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  A Pharmacovigilance Signaling System Based on FDA Regulatory Action and Post-Marketing Adverse Event Reports.

Authors:  Keith B Hoffman; Mo Dimbil; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Robert F Kyle
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  How good are articles on adverse drug reactions?

Authors:  J Venulet; R Blattner; J von Bülow; G C Berneker
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.