Literature DB >> 7369252

The inhibition of premature labor with indomethacin.

J R Niebyl, D A Blake, R D White, K M Kumor, N H Dubin, J C Robinson, P G Egner.   

Abstract

We administered indomethacin orally for the treatment of premature labor in a prospective, randomized, double-blind fashion, and all infants were followed up. Indomethacin was significantly more effective than placebo in inhibition of premature labor during a 24-hour course of therapy, with treatment failure during therapy occurring in only one of 15 indomethacin-treated patients compared to nine of 15 placebo-treated patients (p less than 0.01). Mean plasma concentrations of indomethacin were approximately 0.8 micrograms/ml at both 4 and 12 hours after administration. Mean plasma levels of 15-oxo-13,14-dihydroprostaglandin F2 alpha (PGFM) were similar in the two groups before treatment, decreased markedly in the indomethacin group by 4 hours, and were not detected at 12 hours in all but the one indomethacin-treated patient who was delivered within 24 hours. Patients in the placebo group who were delivered prematurely had higher pretreatment PGFM levels (mean +/- SE, 83 +/- 18 pg/ml, n = 9) than the patients who responded to placebo (25 +/- 6 pg/ml, n = 6) (p less than 0.05). There was no difference between the indomethacin and placebo groups with respect to gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and neonatal morbidity and deaths. In particular, we found no evidence of premature closure of the ductus arteriosus, pulmonary hypertension, or increase in bleeding problems among the infants exposed to indomethacin in utero. Although no difference in neonatal outcome was observed in this small number of patients, it would seem prudent still to consider indomethacin as an experimental therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7369252     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90629-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  21 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics of tocolytic agents.

Authors:  Vassilis Tsatsaris; Dominique Cabrol; Bruno Carbonne
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Metaanalysis of the effect of antenatal indomethacin on neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Sanjiv B Amin; Robert A Sinkin; J Christopher Glantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors for treating preterm labour.

Authors:  Hanna E Reinebrant; Cynthia Pileggi-Castro; Carla L T Romero; Rafaela A N Dos Santos; Sailesh Kumar; João Paulo Souza; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-05

Review 4.  Treatment of preterm labour. A review of the therapeutic options.

Authors:  S N Caritis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Hormonal and local regulation of uterine activity during parturition: Part II--The prostaglandin and adrenergic systems.

Authors:  M Maggi; E Baldi; T Susini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  The microRNA (miR)-199a/214 cluster mediates opposing effects of progesterone and estrogen on uterine contractility during pregnancy and labor.

Authors:  Koriand'r C Williams; Nora E Renthal; Robert D Gerard; Carole R Mendelson
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-09-12

7.  Neurodevelopmental outcome of premature infants after exposure to antenatal indomethacin.

Authors:  Sanjiv B Amin; Majeeda Kamaluddeen; Madhavi Sangem
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Treatment of inflammatory rheumatic disorders in pregnancy: what are the safest treatment options?

Authors:  M Ostensen; R Ramsey-Goldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Non-narcotic analgesics. Use in pregnancy and fetal and perinatal effects.

Authors:  M A Heymann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.