Literature DB >> 736772

Silent perforations of the stomach and duodenum by needles.

M Hashmonai, T Kaufman, A Schramek.   

Abstract

We present a series of ten patients consecutively admitted to the hospital after swallowing 12 household sewing needles. Ten of these needles, one in each patient, had perforated either the stomach or the duodenum, but in no case did the perforation cause any abdominal symptoms or signs. Immediately after arrival in the emergency ward, the diagnosis was made in most cases by means of a diatrizoate meglumine swallow, which showed the tip of the needle protruding outside the gastrointestinal tract. In the first few cases, the diagnosis was made by finding the needle in the same position after repeated plain abdominal roentgenograms. This method, however, served to delay the diagnosis of perforation. All patients were operated on immediately after the diagnosis of perforation was made, except for two who had an additional ingested needle. Operation was delayed in these patients until the second needle was spontaneously eliminated. Perforation was confirmed by operation in all cases in the present series, the operative extraction of the needle was simple, and recovery was uneventful. The fact that patients may remain asymptomatic despite perforation of their stomach or duodenum by sharp, fine foreign bodies is no cause for procrastination of surgery, as severe complications may subsequently result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 736772     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370240028004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  10 in total

1.  Ingested pins causing perforation.

Authors:  T Stricker; C J Kellenberger; T J Neuhaus; M Schwoebel; C P Braegger
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Foreign body ingestion: management of 167 cases.

Authors:  J L Barros; A Caballero; J C Rueda; J M Monturiol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Ingested bone fragment in the bowel: Two cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Seyfi Emir; Zeynep Ozkan; Hasan Baki Altınsoy; Fatih Mehmet Yazar; Selim Sözen; Ilhan Bali
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Management of foreign body ingestion.

Authors:  V Selivanov; G F Sheldon; J P Cello; R A Crass
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Intestinal perforation secondary to ingested foreign bodies: a single-center experience with 38 cases.

Authors:  Xiao-Kun Lin; Da-Zhou Wu; Xiao-Fang Lin; Na Zheng
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Gastric pseudotumoral lesion caused by a fish bone mimicking a gastric submucosal tumor.

Authors:  Se Won Kim; Sang Woon Kim; Sun Kyo Song
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

7.  Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract secondary to ingestion of foreign bodies.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Pierce K H Chow; Hak-Mien Quah; Hock-Soo Ong; Kong-Weng Eu; London L P J Ooi; Wai-Keong Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Medical treatment for a fish bone-induced ileal micro-perforation: a case report.

Authors:  Chein-Chung Kuo; Tsu-Kang Jen; Cheng-Hsin Wen; Chih-Ping Liu; Hai-Sung Hsiao; Yao-Chi Liu; Kuan-Ho Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Small bowel perforation due to fish bone: A case report.

Authors:  Huseyin Pulat; Oktay Karakose; Mehmet Fatih Benzin; Seyma Benzin; Recep Cetin
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-14

10.  Jejunal perforation due to ingested buffalo bone mimicking acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Yadav; Gyanendra Malla; Kunal Bikram Deo; Saroj Giri; Bishnu Murti Bhattarai; Shailesh Adhikary
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-06-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.