Literature DB >> 7364692

A comparison of the effects of fixed and variable ratio schedules of reinforcement on the behavior of deaf children.

R Van Houten, P A Nau.   

Abstract

The performance of all five students in an adjustment class for deaf children was compared under fixed and variable ratio schedules of reinforcement. During the fixed ratio (FR) condition, students earned checks if they were attentive and did not engage in disruptive behavior. These checks could be exchanged for the opportunity to draw a prize from a grab bag. During the variable ratio (VR) condition, they earned a draw from the grab bag according to a variable ratio schedule with a mean ratio equal to the value of the preceding FR schedule. During the VR condition, students visually attended more and engaged in disruptive behavior less often than during the FR condition. The number of math problems completed per minute was also higher during the VR condition although no specific consequences were applied to math performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7364692      PMCID: PMC1308102          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  21 in total

1.  Single and multiple schedules of reinforcement in developmentally retarded children.

Authors:  R ORLANDO; S W BIJOU
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An analysis of individual differences in generalization between receptive and productive language in retarded children.

Authors:  D Guess; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

3.  Application of timeout from positive reinforcement for increasing the efficiency of speech training.

Authors:  L V McReynolds
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

4.  Differential effects of fixed- and variable-time feedback on production rates of elementary school children.

Authors:  R W Saudargas; C H Madsen; J W Scott
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

5.  The use of a token system in project Head Start.

Authors:  L K Miller; R Schneider
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1970

6.  Applying "group" contingencies to the classroom study behavior of preschool children.

Authors:  D Bushell; P A Wrobel; M L Michaelis
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

7.  The home point system: token reinforcement procedures for application by parents of children with behavior problems.

Authors:  E R Christophersen; C M Arnold; D W Hill; H R Quilitch
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1972

8.  Facilitation of the acquisition and retention of sight-word vocabulary through token reinforcement.

Authors:  B B Lahey; R S Drabman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1974

9.  Experiments with token reinforcement in a remedial classroom.

Authors:  M M Wolf; D K Giles; R V Hall
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1968-02

10.  Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1966-02
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A review of reinforcement control procedures.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Obesity treatment in disadvantaged population groups: where do we stand and what can we do?

Authors:  Jean R Harvey; Doris E Ogden
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.018

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.