Literature DB >> 7362769

Is tumour radiosensitization by misonidazole a general phenomenon?

J Denekamp, D G Hirst, F A Stewart, N H Terry.   

Abstract

The response of 14 mouse tumour sub-lines to the radiosensitizing action of a large single dose of misonidazole (MISO) has been assessed by regrowth delay. In 13 of these, significant enhancement of radiation effect occurred under ambient conditions, indicating sensitization of naturally hypoxic cells. The enhancement observed (SER') varied with the radiation dose, as would be predicted for a mixed oxic/hypoxic cell population. The maximum SER' in these 13 tumours did not depend on histology or regrowth rate. The 14th tumour, a slow-growing sarcoma, was not sensitized under ambient conditions, but showed marked sensitization when clamped to produce acutely hypoxic cells. This is consistent with no hypoxic cells occurring naturally in a sarcoma with a slow rate of growth. Faster-growing variants of this tumour showed radiosensitization under ambient conditions. The slow-growing carcinoma, RH, however, appears to contain hypoxic cells and did show sensitization. The cytotoxic action of MISO was compared with the radiosensitization by administering it after irradiation in 8 of the tumour lines. In 2 tumours no cytotoxicity was observed. In the rest cytotoxicity was significant, but much smaller than the sensitization observed when MISO was administered before irradiation. These regrowth-delay data have been used to calculate hypoxic fractions in 3 ways. Estimates of hypoxic fraction ranged from less than 0.1% in the slow sarcoma to greater than or equal to 30% in several tumours. There is considerable variation in the estimate, according to the technique used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7362769      PMCID: PMC2010178          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1980.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  25 in total

1.  Hypoxic cell radiosensitizers: comparative tests of some electron affinic compounds using epidermal cell survival in vivo.

Authors:  J Denekamp; B D Michael; S R Harris
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Electron affinic sensitization. V. Radiosensitization of hypoxic bacteria and mammalian cells in vitro by some nitroimidazoles and nitropyrazoles.

Authors:  J C Asquith; M E Watts; K Patel; C E Smithen; G E Adams
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Hypoxic sensitizers: radiobiological studies at the cellular level.

Authors:  E J Hall; L Roizin-Towle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Tests of two electron-affinic radiosensitizers in vivo using regrowth of an experimental carcinoma.

Authors:  J Denekamp; S R Harris
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Selective chemotherapy of noncycling cells in an in vitro tumor model.

Authors:  R M Sutherland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The relationship between the 'cell loss factor' and the immediate response to radiation in animal tumours.

Authors:  J Denekamp
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  The cellular proliferation kinetics of animal tumors.

Authors:  J Denekamp
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Electron-affinic sensitization. VII. A correlation between structures, one-electron reduction potentials, and efficiencies of nitroimidazoles as hypoxic cell radiosensitizers.

Authors:  G E Adams; I R Flockhart; C E Smithen; I J Stratford; P Wardman; M E Watts
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Effect of hyperthermia on differential cytotoxicity of a hypoxic cell radiosensitizer, Ro-07-0582, on mammalian cells in vitro.

Authors:  I J Stratford; G E Adams
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The gross response of an experimental tumour to single doses of x-rays.

Authors:  R H Thomlinson; E A Craddock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Tumor hypoxia: its impact on cancer therapy.

Authors:  J E Moulder; S Rockwell
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen image hypoxic fraction plus radiation dose strongly correlates with tumor cure in FSa fibrosarcomas.

Authors:  Martyna Elas; Rebecca Bell; Danielle Hleihel; Eugene D Barth; Colin McFaul; Chad R Haney; Joanna Bielanska; Katarzyna Pustelny; Kang-Hyun Ahn; Charles A Pelizzari; Masha Kocherginsky; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Cell cycle distribution of hypoxia and progression of hypoxic tumour cells in vivo.

Authors:  L Webster; R J Hodgkiss; G D Wilson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Interaction of misonidazole and WR-2721--II. Modification of tumour radiosensitization.

Authors:  A Rojas; F A Stewart; J Denekamp
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  In vivo combination of misonidazole and the chemotherapeutic agent CCNU.

Authors:  D W Siemann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  In vivo assessment of basic 2-nitroimidazole radiosensitizers.

Authors:  M V Williams; J Denekamp; A I Minchinton; M R Stratford
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.