Literature DB >> 7361198

The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae.

T Hansson, B Roos, A Nachemson.   

Abstract

The bone mineral content of 109 lumbar vertebrae from 36 different subjects was determined by dual photon absorptiometry. The mean age of the subjects was 58.5 years (range, 31 to 79 years). The ultimate strength of the vertebral bodies was determined during axial compression. Bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength were correlated (r = 0.86) and the strength was found to increase linearly with increasing amounts of bone mineral content. No differences in this correlation were found in the four vertebral levels (L-4) included in the study, but a difference in this correlation was found between specimens taken from male and female subjects. The results make it possible to estimate the strength of a vertebral body from the knowledge of its bone mineral content as determined by dual photon absorptiometry and provide a basis of estimations of normal and abnormal amounts of bone mineral content in the vertebrae of the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7361198     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198001000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  48 in total

1.  An in vitro biomechanical comparison of Cadisc™-L with natural lumbar discs in axial compression and sagittal flexion.

Authors:  Donal McNally; Jason Naylor; Scott Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Authors:  Ruoliang Tang; Celal Gungor; Richard F Sesek; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Sean Gallagher; Gerard A Davis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Advances in noninvasive bone measurement.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; J Vetter; M Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement.

Authors:  K C Lai; M M Goodsitt; R Murano; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].

Authors:  M Reinhold; W Schmölz; F Canto; D Krappinger; M Blauth; C Knop
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Quantification of the roles of trabecular microarchitecture and trabecular type in determining the elastic modulus of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiaowei S Liu; Paul Sajda; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Biomechanics of side impact: injury criteria, aging occupants, and airbag technology.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Brian D Stemper; Thomas A Gennarelli; John A Weigelt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Abnormal stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs following damage to the vertebral bodies: a cause of disc failure?

Authors:  M A Adams; D S McNally; J Wagstaff; A E Goodship
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.